Is it ethical to have sex with a robot?
-
-
blort@social.tchncs.dereplied to evan@cosocial.ca last edited by
Only if the robot is programmed to consent enthusiastically.
-
evan@cosocial.careplied to blort@social.tchncs.de last edited by
@Blort if it's *programmed* to consent enthusiastically, is that real consent?
-
blort@social.tchncs.dereplied to evan@cosocial.ca last edited by
And here we rapidly devolve into debates about if it's possible for free will to exist, or if the universe is entirely mechanistic.
-
cwebber@social.coopreplied to blort@social.tchncs.de last edited by
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to cwebber@social.coop last edited by
-
mxverda@lgbtqia.spacereplied to trwnh@mastodon.social last edited by
-
dpflug@hachyderm.ioreplied to trwnh@mastodon.social last edited by
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to mxverda@lgbtqia.space last edited by
@MxVerda more of an anti-sex joke
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to dpflug@hachyderm.io last edited by
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to trwnh@mastodon.social last edited by trwnh@mastodon.social
@dpflug @cwebber @Blort @evan of course caveats:
1) how you define "consent" matters. this is where the Harkness test could apply.
2) how you define "ethical" matters. for example, philosophical, religious, legal, etc.
3) how you define "sex" matters. which sex acts "count" here? how far does it categorically extend? we can say "oral counts" but then extend that to "kissing is oral" or go really broad and say "all intimate body contact" including handholding
-
blort@social.tchncs.dereplied to trwnh@mastodon.social last edited by
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to blort@social.tchncs.de last edited by