Dúvida: vcs acham que no #Mastodon as instancias deveriam permitir canais de pornografia (ainda que usando CW), atuem na rede?
-
Dúvida: vcs acham que no #Mastodon as instancias deveriam permitir canais de pornografia (ainda que usando CW), atuem na rede? A exemplo: https://mastodon.social/@cornosecuckokds . Honestamente, penso que não! Fiz a denuncia:
-
beaware@social.beaware.livereplied to lobocode@hachyderm.io last edited by
@lobocode there's porn on the internet and 20,000+ instances here....if you have an issue with porn, you might not want to be on the internet...
Just a warning.
If you plan on reporting every porn account, I suggest making a bot or you'll spend your entire lifetime doing so...
-
lobocode@hachyderm.ioreplied to beaware@social.beaware.live last edited by
@BeAware The fact that pornography has existed ever since the internet began doesn’t cancel out the reality that it's often a form of violence and exploitation. Just because something has been around for a long time doesn’t make it less harmful. The prevalence of pornography is tied to deep issues of power, manipulation, and the exploitation of vulnerable people, especially women. ++
-
lobocode@hachyderm.ioreplied to lobocode@hachyderm.io last edited by
@BeAware We can't overlook the fact that a lot of the porn industry thrives on coercion and often profits off people in desperate situations. It perpetuates harmful stereotypes, objectifies individuals, and normalizes damaging behaviors. Just because it’s easily accessible and has become part of the digital world doesn’t mean we should ignore the serious ethical concerns it brings.
-
beaware@social.beaware.livereplied to lobocode@hachyderm.io last edited by
@lobocode that's a different issue that's not going to be solved by Fediverse unfortunately. I recommend using the filter feature. As I said, there's 20,000+ instances here and expecting all of them to ban porn is *quite* unrealistic considering how much of it is already here....it'd be like banning left wing politics, it won't happen.
I'm just being realistic.
-
lobocode@hachyderm.ioreplied to beaware@social.beaware.live last edited by
@BeAware I get that banning porn across all instances might be unrealistic, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s an industry built on exploitation and harm. Ignoring it just because it’s widespread feels like avoiding the real issue. Filters are a temporary fix, but we should be having conversations about how to reduce the harm it causes, rather than accepting it as a permanent reality.
-
beaware@social.beaware.livereplied to lobocode@hachyderm.io last edited by
@lobocode ahhh...I thought you were trying to discuss porn on Fediverse. What you really want to discuss is porn existing.
That's a whole different topic.