<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[consider two hypothetical #ActivityPub properties:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>consider two hypothetical <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ActivityPub" rel="tag">#<span>ActivityPub</span></a> properties:</p><p>- `client`, which signals applications attached to the current actor as activitypub Clients<br />- `server`, which points to the current service handling the current actor's inbox as an activitypub Server</p><p>your task is to bikeshed these two properties until they make sense. go</p>]]></description><link>https://bb.devnull.land/topic/98b895a6-aca2-44b6-941a-cdc186b79a25/consider-two-hypothetical-activitypub-properties</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 08:06:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bb.devnull.land/topic/98b895a6-aca2-44b6-941a-cdc186b79a25.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:06:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to consider two hypothetical #ActivityPub properties: on Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:14:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>for my part, i think the terms can be made more clear or explicit, for example calling them `hasActivityPubClientAttached` and `inboxManagedByActivityPubServer`, but perhaps this is going too far.</p><p>also inbox is technically from LDP/LDN and not activitypub, so there probably should be *some* (re)consideration of the server property</p>]]></description><link>https://bb.devnull.land/post/https://mastodon.social/users/trwnh/statuses/113363287302398494</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bb.devnull.land/post/https://mastodon.social/users/trwnh/statuses/113363287302398494</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[trwnh@mastodon.social]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:14:48 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>