Could be potentially nice for fediverse server testing, as more implementations make the jump to final RFC 9421 HTTP signatures.
-
Hi @julian, you mean my pull request into peertube/http-signature? Have at it. Working with the test framework that the original library is annoying.
Recently I found that I made a mistake requiring
algsignature parameter in my RFC 9421 implementation, which I carried over there, but that node library also requires it. -
Hi @julian, you mean my pull request into peertube/http-signature? Have at it. Working with the test framework that the original library is annoying.
Recently I found that I made a mistake requiring
algsignature parameter in my RFC 9421 implementation, which I carried over there, but that node library also requires it.@mradcliffe@nokoto.org if Iceshrimp wafrn and Misskey use that lib that's pretty good isn't it? Does the base package not support the latest RFC 9421?
-
@julian No, TritonDataCenter/node-http-signature, the original http-signature npm lib, that PeerTube forked doesn’t support RFC 9421.
-
@julian No, TritonDataCenter/node-http-signature, the original http-signature npm lib, that PeerTube forked doesn’t support RFC 9421.
@mradcliffe@nokoto.org on thanks, I will take a look at your fork and see if I am able to integrate it into NodeBB. Will DM you shortly.
-
When last I left off, I made a pull request to
peertube/http-signaturelibrary try to help the JavaScript ecosystem reach RFC 9421 parity while being backwards-compatible with cavage-12 draft implementations. There has not been any traction on this yet. Maybe because PeerTube has abandoned its own use of the library.So our current ecosystem state is the following:
- PeerTube uses
misskey-dev/node-http-message-signatureslibrary and owns the defacto unmaintainedpeertube/http-signaturelibrary. - Misskey and the rest of the ‘keyverse use
peertube/http-signaturelibrary and Misskey owns the defacto...
@mradcliffe Does your instance support RFC-9421 verification?
- PeerTube uses
-
@mradcliffe Does your instance support RFC-9421 verification?
@silverpill It should, but it isn’t node.js based.
I wanted to help the node.js ecosystem by making
peertube/http-signaturebackwards-compatible for both draft and RFC-9421.Although I apologize that I am requiring
alg. -
@silverpill It should, but it isn’t node.js based.
I wanted to help the node.js ecosystem by making
peertube/http-signaturebackwards-compatible for both draft and RFC-9421.Although I apologize that I am requiring
alg.@mradcliffe I've sent a
Likeactivity.The server responds with 403 when request contains RFC-9421 signature.
Draft-Cavage version was accepted (202). -
@mradcliffe@nokoto.org no problem, I'll email you tomorrow about this
-
Hey @mradcliffe@nokoto.org I emailed your handle but it bounced
-
@julian Huh, I thought I had that setup. Try mradcliffe at kosada dot com.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login