Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ

jdp23@blahaj.zone

@jdp23@blahaj.zone
About
Posts
6
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

View Original

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Chats are now federating as limited-visibility posts on the fediverse
    jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ jdp23@blahaj.zone

    @julian@community.nodebb.org no, no, i just edited my post, I was confused ... in fact it wasn't working, I'll try from a Mastodon account

    AP Test (community.nodebb.org) activitypub nodebbactivityp chats

  • Chats are now federating as limited-visibility posts on the fediverse
    jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ jdp23@blahaj.zone

    Seems to work! WHy did you think it didn't?

    Sharkey is kind of a mess these days, sigh.

    @julian@community.nodebb.org

    AP Test (community.nodebb.org) activitypub nodebbactivityp chats

  • Chats are now federating as limited-visibility posts on the fediverse
    jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ jdp23@blahaj.zone

    @julian@community.nodebb.org yeah, horrible UX. talk about violating the principle of least surprised! it's happened to me more than once.

    Sharkey bizarrely has almost the inverse UX problem. The 'to' list is separate, as it should be ... but if it's more than a couple of people it extends off the right side of the screen (at least in Firefox) and there's no way to scroll. So I replied to a DM that had five people in it, deleted their mentions from the main text ... and still replied to them because they were on the To line, just not visible.

    And then I'm pretty sure that if you DM reply on Mastodon to the Sharkey message, accounts show up in the reply even though there's absolutely no evidence that they were on the message you were replying to (because the mentions weren't there in the text, and Mastodon doesn't show a separate To line, or something like that).
    @stefan@stefanbohacek.online I think you ran into this as well?

    Easy. Just like email. Yeah right. lolsob.

    AP Test (community.nodebb.org) activitypub nodebbactivityp chats

  • Chats are now federating as limited-visibility posts on the fediverse
    jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ jdp23@blahaj.zone

    Wow, that's great to see! And this in particular ...

    You can mention whoever you want without the message accidentally leaking out because who you mention is different from who is in the chat room.
    ... is a very good call.

    @julian@community.nodebb.org

    AP Test (community.nodebb.org) activitypub nodebbactivityp chats

  • Can I bridge from NodeBB to Bluesky?
    jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ jdp23@blahaj.zone

    Similar search results on blahaj.zone (which is on Sharkey)

    searching for
    https://discussions.thenexus.today/post/52 works

    searching for
    https://discussions.thenexus.today/topic/16/can-i-bridge-from-nodebb-to-bluesky/12 gives an internal error in Sharkey, oh dear.

    Also GoToSocial strips the subject header out in replies, as does Mastodon.

    @nexus@gts-test.thenexus.today @jon@discussions.thenexus.today @thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange @julian@community.nodebb.org

    AP Test (community.nodebb.org)

  • The current state of context resolution
    jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ jdp23@blahaj.zone

    @julian@community.nodebb.org very interesting work, it's certainly addressing an important problem!

    AP Test 3 (socialhub.activitypub.rocks) forumwg activitypub swicg
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular