NodeBB

"Season 9 but good" is definitely how I would describe it. Definitely feels like the early seasons of the original run but with the old cast promoted to chiefs/residents with the "young cast" filling their intern roles. And yeah, unlike season 9, you actually like the new characters.

My understanding from a reading of the relevant section from fe34 suggests a claim of A → B is reciprocal if there is an inverse claim B → A.Yes, and in my understanding these claims are:- This actor is authorized to delete/update this object.- This object is hosted on the server where this actor is an administrator.But I don't insist on importing this concept.I would want to point out that keeping with prior art has the benefit of making this FEP much easier to adopt by threadiverse implementors.I consider myself a threadiverse implementer too, and I don't really like the idea of dealing with ambiguous properties At the very least, could you add inbox and outbox properties to the Application actor example? https://codeberg.org/devnull/feps/src/branch/instance-admins/fep/baf5/fep-baf5.md#instance-actor-and-application-actor

test four begins now.