@trwnh embed, preview, link or similar if you want to drive behavior. If you want semantics, then the list from earlier: reply, review, see also, example, and so on in an open-ended list of possibilities. The last one will almost certainly lead to more whack-a-mole driven development.
joelving@mastodon.joelving.dk
Posts
-
question mainly to proponents of quote posts, but anyone can respond: -
question mainly to proponents of quote posts, but anyone can respond:@trwnh I see that AS2 links already have a rel property. Might be usable here?
-
question mainly to proponents of quote posts, but anyone can respond:@trwnh I'd say that that is simultaneously too narrow and too wide. Too narrow if it's to say something about intent, and too wide if it's about display.
I don't think the first (intent) is possible to enumerate, but the second absolutely is. Then I'd maybe simply do something like `rel` for an anchor and use `display='embed'`, `display='preview'` or `display='link'`, maybe as links in a context-collection or something. -
question mainly to proponents of quote posts, but anyone can respond:@trwnh Maybe I'm not getting what you're trying to achieve. My point was that it will probably be impossible to enumerate every kind of relationship between two posts. We have "replies", "for example", "see also", "source", "rebuttal", "review", and the list goes on.
Am I missing what you're after? -
question mainly to proponents of quote posts, but anyone can respond:@trwnh I think that's really hard to give a complete answer to. To me, the question is similar to "for what reasons might you reference something else as part of a conversation or post"