Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. BadgeFed @ FediForum June 2025: Unconferences, Demos, and Community Feedback

BadgeFed @ FediForum June 2025: Unconferences, Demos, and Community Feedback

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
activitypubbadgefedfediversedotnetdecentralizatio
5 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • badgefed@badgefed.vocalcat.comB This user is from outside of this forum
    badgefed@badgefed.vocalcat.comB This user is from outside of this forum
    badgefed@badgefed.vocalcat.com
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    BadgeFed @ FediForum June 2025: Unconferences, Demos, and Community Feedback

    Hey Fediverse! 👋

    We just wrapped up an amazing FediForum June 2025 a week ago, and BadgeFed was right in the thick of it! Here’s a recap of what we did, what we learned, and what’s next for decentralized badges.


    BadgeFed at FediForum: Unconferences & Speed Demos

    BadgeFed had the honor of presenting and hosting two unconference sessions and showing off our work in one speed demo slots (watch the demo). The energy was fantastic; lots of curiosity, sharp questions, and a real hunger for open standards in the credentialing space.

    Community Feedback: Standards, Docs, and Openness

    A big theme at FediForum was specs and open standards. We’re right there with you! That’s why we’ve enhanced our technical documentation to explain exactly how BadgeFed uses ActivityPub and OpenBadges together:

    • Issuers are ActivityPub actors, each instance can federate and follow others.
    • Badges are ActivityPub Notes with OpenBadge 2.1 attachments for maximum compatibility and verifiability.
    • Strict linking between issuer and badge, and between badge and recipient, to prevent spoofing.
    • Signature validation for both ActivityPub and OpenBadge data.
    • Federation: badges propagate via follows, and a special announcer actor helps with discoverability.
    • Comments and interactions: badges can be discussed and shared across the Fediverse.

    Read more in our DETAILS.md.

    Making BadgeFed Easier to Try

    We heard you: people want to try BadgeFed! Right now, it’s a solo setup (one admin, one Docker container), but we’re working hard to make it easier for others to deploy, configure, and even federate their own instances. Stay tuned for updates on multi-admin support and streamlined onboarding.

    Feedback: Discoverability vs. Spam

    One of the most important pieces of feedback we received was about badge discoverability vs. timeline spam (see the issue). We want badges to be easy to find and share, but we also don’t want to flood the Fediverse with unwanted posts. This is now our top priority, we’re rethinking how verbose BadgeFed should be, and exploring opt-in/opt-out models for badge visibility and hashtag use.

    What’s Next: Embedding & Profile Badges

    We’re also working on ways to let you embed badges in your blog or add them to your Mastodon profile. More news on that soon!


    FediForum was a fantastic experience, huge thanks to everyone who attended, gave feedback, and showed interest in decentralized credentials. Let’s keep building a more open, verifiable, and user-empowered Fediverse!

    Badge up, and see you in the timeline! 🏅


    You can read the article "BadgeFed @ FediForum June 2025: Unconferences, Demos, and Community Feedback" by @mapache here as well.

    #activitypub #badgefed #fediverse #dotnet #decentralization #open-source #openbadges #identity #fediforum #recap
    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • badgefed@badgefed.vocalcat.comB badgefed@badgefed.vocalcat.com

      BadgeFed @ FediForum June 2025: Unconferences, Demos, and Community Feedback

      Hey Fediverse! 👋

      We just wrapped up an amazing FediForum June 2025 a week ago, and BadgeFed was right in the thick of it! Here’s a recap of what we did, what we learned, and what’s next for decentralized badges.


      BadgeFed at FediForum: Unconferences & Speed Demos

      BadgeFed had the honor of presenting and hosting two unconference sessions and showing off our work in one speed demo slots (watch the demo). The energy was fantastic; lots of curiosity, sharp questions, and a real hunger for open standards in the credentialing space.

      Community Feedback: Standards, Docs, and Openness

      A big theme at FediForum was specs and open standards. We’re right there with you! That’s why we’ve enhanced our technical documentation to explain exactly how BadgeFed uses ActivityPub and OpenBadges together:

      • Issuers are ActivityPub actors, each instance can federate and follow others.
      • Badges are ActivityPub Notes with OpenBadge 2.1 attachments for maximum compatibility and verifiability.
      • Strict linking between issuer and badge, and between badge and recipient, to prevent spoofing.
      • Signature validation for both ActivityPub and OpenBadge data.
      • Federation: badges propagate via follows, and a special announcer actor helps with discoverability.
      • Comments and interactions: badges can be discussed and shared across the Fediverse.

      Read more in our DETAILS.md.

      Making BadgeFed Easier to Try

      We heard you: people want to try BadgeFed! Right now, it’s a solo setup (one admin, one Docker container), but we’re working hard to make it easier for others to deploy, configure, and even federate their own instances. Stay tuned for updates on multi-admin support and streamlined onboarding.

      Feedback: Discoverability vs. Spam

      One of the most important pieces of feedback we received was about badge discoverability vs. timeline spam (see the issue). We want badges to be easy to find and share, but we also don’t want to flood the Fediverse with unwanted posts. This is now our top priority, we’re rethinking how verbose BadgeFed should be, and exploring opt-in/opt-out models for badge visibility and hashtag use.

      What’s Next: Embedding & Profile Badges

      We’re also working on ways to let you embed badges in your blog or add them to your Mastodon profile. More news on that soon!


      FediForum was a fantastic experience, huge thanks to everyone who attended, gave feedback, and showed interest in decentralized credentials. Let’s keep building a more open, verifiable, and user-empowered Fediverse!

      Badge up, and see you in the timeline! 🏅


      You can read the article "BadgeFed @ FediForum June 2025: Unconferences, Demos, and Community Feedback" by @mapache here as well.

      #activitypub #badgefed #fediverse #dotnet #decentralization #open-source #openbadges #identity #fediforum #recap
      ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @badgefed @mapache Can I strongly encourage OpenBadges 3.0? I am playing with implementing a backpack for badges and OpenBadges 2.x is annoyingly dependent on network access for basic information that OpenBadges 3.x badges include built-in.

      mapache@hachyderm.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

        @badgefed @mapache Can I strongly encourage OpenBadges 3.0? I am playing with implementing a backpack for badges and OpenBadges 2.x is annoyingly dependent on network access for basic information that OpenBadges 3.x badges include built-in.

        mapache@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
        mapache@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
        mapache@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @ocdtrekkie @badgefed and hey, if we can help to do that backpack badgefed compatible (which is really #activitypub + #openbadges) lmk

        ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • tag-activitypub@relay.fedi.buzzT tag-activitypub@relay.fedi.buzz shared this topic
        • mapache@hachyderm.ioM mapache@hachyderm.io

          @ocdtrekkie @badgefed and hey, if we can help to do that backpack badgefed compatible (which is really #activitypub + #openbadges) lmk

          ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @mapache @badgefed As it happens I am currently trying to put it on Sandstorm, which is a self-hosting platform that is not particularly ActivityPub-friendly at the moment. Something we definitely want a successive version of the platform to tackle some day... but at that point we could just package BadgeFed. 😉

          smallcircles@social.coopS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

            @mapache @badgefed As it happens I am currently trying to put it on Sandstorm, which is a self-hosting platform that is not particularly ActivityPub-friendly at the moment. Something we definitely want a successive version of the platform to tackle some day... but at that point we could just package BadgeFed. 😉

            smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
            smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
            smallcircles@social.coop
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @ocdtrekkie @mapache @badgefed

            I was not aware of that Should #Sandstorm be added to the #ActivityPub delightful lists? An intent to implement (e.g. in an open issue) is sufficient for inclusion.

            https://delightful.coding.social

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0

            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

            Register Login
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups