Does anyone know of Mastodon servers that use outbound RFC9421 HTTP-Signatures ?
-
Does anyone know of Mastodon servers that use outbound RFC9421 HTTP-Signatures ?
According to the release notes, version 4.5 should have it enabled by default for outgoing requests using the double knocking mechanism, but so far I haven't seen any request containing them...
-
System shared this topic on
-
Does anyone know of Mastodon servers that use outbound RFC9421 HTTP-Signatures ?
According to the release notes, version 4.5 should have it enabled by default for outgoing requests using the double knocking mechanism, but so far I haven't seen any request containing them...
@mariusor wow, I didn't know that. Great news.
-
@mariusor wow, I didn't know that. Great news.
@evan maybe it's not true, but that's how I interpreted this release note:
-
@evan maybe it's not true, but that's how I interpreted this release note:
@evan hmmm, I looked at the PR mentioned in that bullet point and I think it might be for accepting incoming RFC9421 signed requests, not using them for outbound ones to other servers...
-
@evan maybe it's not true, but that's how I interpreted this release note:
@mariusor @evan I'm not sure how they tested it, but I was also under the impression that it was finished.
I had a thread on the topic a few days ago, got some informative replies: https://activitypub.space/topic/912fb573-4db3-44ba-a886-daed413b6769/could-be-potentially-nice-for-fediverse-server-testing-as-more-implementations-make-the-jump-to-final-rfc-9421-http-signatures.
-
@mariusor @evan I'm not sure how they tested it, but I was also under the impression that it was finished.
I had a thread on the topic a few days ago, got some informative replies: https://activitypub.space/topic/912fb573-4db3-44ba-a886-daed413b6769/could-be-potentially-nice-for-fediverse-server-testing-as-more-implementations-make-the-jump-to-final-rfc-9421-http-signatures.
@julian the question stemed from me working on the RFC9421 support in #GoActivityPub
I was curious if I can do some quick debugging on my servers with some existing, widely used, implementation.
-
@evan hmmm, I looked at the PR mentioned in that bullet point and I think it might be for accepting incoming RFC9421 signed requests, not using them for outbound ones to other servers...
@mariusor still, that's *massive*.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login