Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

hugh@ausglam.spaceH

hugh@ausglam.space

@hugh@ausglam.space
About
Posts
1
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

View Original

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • @hugh @skyfaller part of the problem with how “underdefined” it is, is that we’re not talking about the big picture being there but mostly in need of filling in the gaps.
    hugh@ausglam.spaceH hugh@ausglam.space

    @trwnh

    Yes that's what has become clearer to me as more people outline what they think the gap is (surprise: they don't all agree on that). There's a chasm between what the people writing the spec were imagining, and what most projects that use AP are trying to do. While the lack of detail on authorisation is a pretty major problem, it now seems to me that to a fair extent the issue is more a mismatch between the conceptual model of the ActivityPub spec (thick clients doing the work, with servers passing messages between them) and what most fediverse projects are trying to do (tightly-coupled server-client apps that talk to each other).

    @skyfaller

    Uncategorized
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular