NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

@luna one of the things from my mental model is that there are some common layers to communication protocols- storage- transport- identitythen you have the finer details like data model and schema and semantics and whateveratproto has a good story for storage and identity... but you could build the same with solid and dids (or even controller documents over https which are basically did documents without the did bits)

@thisismissem @hongminhee context declaration are ordered and scoped so you need to be careful not to override the as2 terms at any point, otherwise you get stuff like schema:name instead of as:name.also mastodon does something bonkers, the PropertyValue uses as:name instead of schema:name, even after you account for the incorrect prefix/expansion

@sunil the reality is that there are multiple protocols that only partially overlap. you can group them very loosely into taxonomies based on what the primary compatibility target is, like “mastodon” or “lemmy”, but even within those taxonomies you still have quirks to account for. the compatibility is nonzero but it’s incidental moreso than it is due to adherence to a well-defined protocol

@simplycorbett same. I have a feeling we won't know for sure for awhile. AP will just start adding things like monetization and such and I'm sure that'll be used ethically, right? Right?!?‍️

@Tengohipo facts. I've learned the hard way not to respect people for what they've done and to base it off of who they are.Some people make cool things, then literally whine like a child when they are critisized.

@matt Didn’t know that one for moving the cursor on a terminal window. Thanks!Out of curiosity, even though it was not mentioned in the video, did your recent discovery of the “copy/move here” action prompt you into making this video perhaps?https://isfeeling.social/@matt/113330219473832667

@BeAware And also to boo!! ‍️

@tb_99999 goodwill? You're joking right?Right?!?!

@jdp23 @hrefna > A project like mastodon could define their own conformance profile, of coursethere's an apparent lack of will in doing so. i've actually approached them about taking steps toward making these definitions available, but no bites.i also think there's a political convenience in saying it's "activitypub" instead of "the mastodon protocol". everyone wants to be "activitypub" because that's what has the w3c stamp of legitimacy.

@erincandescent @scott @julianso the notification is the Like itself, the message that “someone liked this”and the action is the side effect of adding to likesyou might Like an object without a likes collection, but even if you send that activity to the object’s owner, their AP server probably won’t do anything with it because the side effects are a no-op without a likes collection. (unless there’s a secret likes collection that is just undeclared on the object?)