at the risk of igniting a protocol war, i'm not sure OpenWebAuth is the best solution for cross-domain identity, for a few reasons:

• it has reliances on older and not-widely-implemented technologies. the rest of the tech space is converging on oauth and related technologies, and not the old http signatures cavage draft stuff. using webfinger to look up a "magic endpoint" for the user, and again to look up the "root url" to find a bespoke "token endpoint", is simply duplicating a lot of work that has been standardized in other specifications.
• it makes no proper distinction between the key and the actor. the problem with current public key infrastructure in fedi is that keys are not only custodial, but they may be shared across the entire server. so anyone else on your server may be able to access remote resources "on your behalf", as it were, in the case that a single keypair existed and was declared for every single actor on the local origin.
• it relies on query parameters which can easily leak into logs or get copied-and-pasted accidentally by a user. the proper place for authorization tokens and such is in the Authorization header (which does not generally get logged).
• it assumes that there is a "home instance" and does not support the possibility of external identity providers that are not themselves fediverse instances.

@trwnh@socialhub.activitypub.rocks @scott@authorship.studio If not for HTTP signatures, would we be looking toward proofs to guarantee authenticity of received activities?

depends what you're trying to assert or prove. signing http messages in general is something that could still be done, if your goal is to assert who made the http request. embedding a signature on a document is fine, if your goal is to assert who authored the document and that the document has not been modified. (or you could limit it to just the content, or some arbitrary metadata, or whatever.)

for any key-based verification methods, you need to be wary of key reuse. it's possible for the keyId to be different, but for the key material to be the same as some other key. you can generally tell that an actor is represented by a key, and then the key can claim to be controlled by that actor, but you don't know if the associated private key is in fact being controlled by other actors unknown to you, or if other actors are represented by the same public key material. so some level of deduplication of public keys may be needed before you can authenticate an identity. of course the "real" problem is that the keys are most likely custodial, and rather than try to discover and enumerate every single actor from a given domain, most implementers just assume that any keyId on a given domain is in reality controlled by the software running on that domain. (the same-origin policy, basically.)

so in conclusion, if you're trying to know that a given identity is behind the request, then the best you can tell right now is that their server is making the request. whereas with stuff like fedcm oidc or fedcm indieauth, the request is happening in the browser.

I get the following error trying to upgrade from v3.9.10 on my dev install:

4. Updating NodeBB data store schema...
Parsing upgrade scripts...
OK | 8 script(s) found, 145 skipped
  → [2024/2/22] Setting up default configs/privileges re: ActivityPub...Error occurred
Error occurred during upgrade: Error: [[error:invalid-data]]
    at Meta.slugTaken (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/meta/index.js:34:9)
    at Object.wrapperCallback [as slugTaken] (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/promisify.js:46:11)
    at generateHandle (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/categories/create.js:153:26)
    at Object.wrapperCallback [as generateHandle] (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/promisify.js:46:11)
    at /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrades/4.0.0/activitypub_setup.js:25:36
    at Array.map (<anonymous>)
    at Object.method (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrades/4.0.0/activitypub_setup.js:23:42)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)
    at async Upgrade.process (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrade.js:161:4)
    at async Upgrade.run (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrade.js:110:2)

@sweetp can you please add console.log(names); to line 22 (the blank line) in src/upgrade/4.0.0/activitypub_setup.js, and run ./nodebb upgrade activitypub_setup again?

@Julian here you go:

Parsing upgrade scripts...
OK | 1 script(s) found
  → [2024/2/22] Setting up default configs/privileges re: ActivityPub...[
  { name: 'Cookie 7' },
  { name: 'TuneTag' },
  { name: 'Cookie 5' },
  { name: 'News' },
  { name: 'Minim' },
  { name: 'Cookie 4' },
  { name: 'ColorWell' },
  { name: 'Cookie 6' },
  { name: 'WiFiSpoof' },
  { name: 'SessionRestore JS' },
  { name: 'Privatus' },
  { name: 'USBclean' },
  { name: 'SessionRestore' },
  { name: 'Hides' },
  { name: 'Xliff Editor' },
  { name: 'Other apps' },
  { name: 'Invisible' },
  { name: 'Archived' },
  { name: 'Misc' },
  { name: null }
]
Error occurred
2024-10-03T18:18:47.515Z [4568/1713751] - error: uncaughtException: [[error:invalid-data]]
Error: [[error:invalid-data]]
    at Meta.slugTaken (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/meta/index.js:34:9)
    at Object.wrapperCallback [as slugTaken] (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/promisify.js:46:11)
    at generateHandle (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/categories/create.js:153:26)
    at Object.wrapperCallback [as generateHandle] (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/promisify.js:46:11)
    at /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrades/4.0.0/activitypub_setup.js:25:36
    at Array.map (<anonymous>)
    at Object.method (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrades/4.0.0/activitypub_setup.js:23:42)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)
    at async Upgrade.process (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrade.js:161:4)
    at async Upgrade.runParticular (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrade.js:118:2) {"date":"Thu Oct 03 2024 20:18:47 GMT+0200 (Central European Summer Time)","error":{},"exception":true,"os":{"loadavg":[0.21,0.17,0.06],"uptime":2804105.47},"process":{"argv":["/opt/plesk/node/22/bin/node","/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/nodebb","upgrade","activitypub_setup"],"cwd":"/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB","execPath":"/opt/plesk/node/22/bin/node","gid":1003,"memoryUsage":{"arrayBuffers":869789,"external":4802391,"heapTotal":92000256,"heapUsed":63868520,"rss":177631232},"pid":1713751,"uid":10011,"version":"v22.9.0"},"stack":"Error: [[error:invalid-data]]\n    at Meta.slugTaken (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/meta/index.js:34:9)\n    at Object.wrapperCallback [as slugTaken] (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/promisify.js:46:11)\n    at generateHandle (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/categories/create.js:153:26)\n    at Object.wrapperCallback [as generateHandle] (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/promisify.js:46:11)\n    at /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrades/4.0.0/activitypub_setup.js:25:36\n    at Array.map (<anonymous>)\n    at Object.method (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrades/4.0.0/activitypub_setup.js:23:42)\n    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)\n    at async Upgrade.process (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrade.js:161:4)\n    at async Upgrade.runParticular (/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrade.js:118:2)","trace":[{"column":9,"file":"/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/meta/index.js","function":"Meta.slugTaken","line":34,"method":"slugTaken","native":false},{"column":11,"file":"/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/promisify.js","function":"Object.wrapperCallback [as slugTaken]","line":46,"method":"wrapperCallback [as slugTaken]","native":false},{"column":26,"file":"/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/categories/create.js","function":"generateHandle","line":153,"method":null,"native":false},{"column":11,"file":"/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/promisify.js","function":"Object.wrapperCallback [as generateHandle]","line":46,"method":"wrapperCallback [as generateHandle]","native":false},{"column":36,"file":"/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrades/4.0.0/activitypub_setup.js","function":null,"line":25,"method":null,"native":false},{"column":null,"file":null,"function":"Array.map","line":null,"method":"map","native":false},{"column":42,"file":"/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrades/4.0.0/activitypub_setup.js","function":"Object.method","line":23,"method":"method","native":false},{"column":5,"file":"node:internal/process/task_queues","function":"process.processTicksAndRejections","line":105,"method":"processTicksAndRejections","native":false},{"column":4,"file":"/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrade.js","function":"async Upgrade.process","line":161,"method":"process","native":false},{"column":2,"file":"/var/www/vhosts/domain.com/test.domain.com/NodeBB/src/upgrade.js","function":"async Upgrade.runParticular","line":118,"method":"runParticular","native":false}]}
$

@sweetp what is the last category, and how come it has no name?

@Julian Im not sure, is there any way to purge it?

@sweetp does it correspond to an existing category? Or are all of your categories represented in the output above?

@Julian all my categories are repesented by the log output

@Julian I filtered out the null names and the upgrade went through:

"use strict";

const db = require("../../database");
const meta = require("../../meta");
const categories = require("../../categories");
const slugify = require("../../slugify");

module.exports = {
  name: "Setting up default configs/privileges re: ActivityPub",
  timestamp: Date.UTC(2024, 1, 22),
  method: async () => {
    // Disable ActivityPub (upgraded installs have to opt-in to AP)
    meta.configs.set("activitypubEnabled", 0);

    // Set default privileges for world category
    const install = require("../../install");
    await install.giveWorldPrivileges();

    // Run through all categories and ensure their slugs are unique (incl. users/groups too)
    const cids = await db.getSortedSetMembers("categories:cid");
    const names = await db.getObjectsFields(
      cids.map((cid) => `category:${cid}`),
      cids.map(() => "name"),
    );

    const nullIndexes = names
      .map((element, index) => (element["name"] === null ? index : -1)) // mark null elements
      .filter((index) => index !== -1);

    let filteredNames = names.filter(element => element["name"] !== null);
    let filteredCids = cids.filter((_, index) => !nullIndexes.includes(index));

    const handles = await Promise.all(
      filteredCids.map(async (cid, idx) => {
        const { name } = filteredNames[idx];
        const handle = await categories.generateHandle(slugify(name));
        return handle;
      }),
    );

    await Promise.all([
      db.setObjectBulk(
        filteredCids.map((cid, idx) => [`category:${cid}`, { handle: handles[idx] }]),
      ),
      db.sortedSetAdd("categoryhandle:cid", filteredCids, handles),
    ]);
  },
};

I’ve been playing around with community.nodebb.org, in anticipation of 4.0’s launch, and I’ve noticed that the Lemmy groups I’ve followed don’t appear to be showing up. I can see posts from Mastodon (and whatever else) users that I’ve followed in World, but not Lemmy groups.

Is this expected or intended? Following nodeBB topics from Lemmy has worked OK, so I thought it would be bidirectional.

Though, now that I’m comparing this post on lemmy.ca to that on the mothership, I see that replies from nodebb.org users aren’t showing up on the remote instance, either. Just those from off-site users. I’m caught somewhat off guard by that, too. Is that behaviour expected?

@kichae@lemmy.ca whether replies from here appear on lemmy.ca depends on whether a user from lemmy.ca follows a user here. Perhaps that isn't the case? (Hopefully you see this reply now )

Still need to debug Lemmy federation. Might be a regression.

What about Design v4, is the same like 3.11.0? Is there Grid categories Options with images?
Invision Community tests v5 Beta 6. Here some Forums

Fan Clubs - Sports, Gaming, and Creator Social Network

Fan Clubs is a social networking platform where content creators, sports fans, and gamers can connect with their communities.

Fan Clubs (www.fanclubs.org)

Jimi Wikman - Atlassian Expert - JimiWikman.se

On this site you can find all kind of things related to IT development and topics such as Atlassian, Security and E-Commerce.

JimiWikman.se (jimiwikman.se)

Inter Milan : Communauté Francophone des Nerazzurri

La référence francophone sur l'Inter Milan et la plus grande source d'informations en français sur le club de football F.C. Internazionale Milano

Inter Milan : Communauté Francophone des Nerazzurri (www.internazionale.fr)

@julian said in NodeBB v4.0.0 Beta:

whether a user from lemmy.ca follows a user here

Hmm. That's going to be a big issue for Lemmy federation, then, because Lemmy doesn't even allow you to follow users, only groups. If that's the case, this seems like a deeper compatibility issue, and probably is probably more of a feature update than a bug fix.

@Kichae @kichae@lemmy.ca That's an issue with all software federating via ActivityPub. If there isn't an existing follow relationship then the content isn't pushed to that user.

That's greatly simplifying it, of course. There's quite a bit more that actually goes into how it works.

In the case of the referenced topic, NodeBB automatically boosts replies that it receives from the category actor. When replies are made by NodeBB users, they are also addressed to everybody who has participated in the topic.

So given that, lemmy.ca should have received everything, at least since you started posting in it. In reality, there might be a connection issue between NodeBB and Lemmy, and that's what I'd want to verify first.

No, I understand, it's just that I am following the group actors. I'm following the Lemmy communities from here, but new posts from them aren't arriving. I'm following the nodeBB topics from Lemmy, but nodeBB user comments aren't showing up there.

@Kichae no the group actors are fine too. We implement the same sharing system that Lemmy implements.

Hmm, ok. Unexpected and unintended interactions (or lack there of) it is, then. Fun!

@Kichae the forking is local only. There's no standard way to communicate a fork action across to other instances.

We'll try to be pioneers and come up with a way though!