Quoted posts
-
julian@community.nodebb.orgreplied to thisismissem@hachyderm.io on last edited by
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io Yes, I've noticed that Megalodon also doesn't support blockquotes, but the web client definitely does (I just checked hachyderm), which is a great start.
-
thisismissem@hachyderm.ioreplied to julian@community.nodebb.org on last edited by
@julian so perhaps more an advocacy thing than a feature change?
-
Little heads-up: So far, Hubzilla renders everything the way I guess it's intended. Nothing out of the ordinary.
-
>How that is represented via ActivityPub is probably detailed in some FEP
FEP-e232? I think you can add
content
orsummary
property to FEP-e232 link to represent HTML content of a quote -
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to thisismissem@hachyderm.io on last edited by
@thisismissem @julian @leroy @renchap I take the same view as @leroy as well -- you can render replies as a rich preview above every post that happens to be a reply. Discord does this, for example. In fact, if Mastodon did this, then they would only need a way to tell when to insert such "quote replies" into timelines and when not to. It could be as simple as a boolean toot:quoteReply = true. With management of the `replies` collection via FEP-7458 (and some proof/stamp mechanism like FEP-0391).
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to silverpill@mitra.social on last edited by
@silverpill @thisismissem @julian I think you could define a Quote type that is a subclass of Link and use microsyntax to find-and-replace the blockquote with a rich entity with `content` or maybe even `preview`. But this generally makes sense only when you want that rich entity, and not just a "simple" blockquote.
Discourse for example uses [quote] tags kinda like bbcode, and they add metadata something like [quote author:someone,thread:2319,post:69] where the metadata is used in the preview.
-
julian@community.nodebb.orgreplied to trwnh@mastodon.social on last edited by
@trwnh@mastodon.social part of the reason we don't do this special syntax is because we (probably) made the conscious decision to keep the composer as simple as possible so that end users wouldn't have to relearn a bespoke syntax.
... but I'm not really sure anymore. My rationale could just be post facto lol
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to julian@community.nodebb.org on last edited by
@julian yeah, if you have a rich composer it's less bad. i don't think i've ever manually authored a quote tag in Discourse, for example. every single time i quote someone it's via the floating button that appears when you select something, or via the dropdown menu option
-
For reference, Hubzilla renders both the same way.
If you "share" someone's post (what Mastodon users call a "quote post") is basically just:@channel@example.com
[quote]Whatever they said.[/quote]
which gets translated to:@channel@example.com
<blockquote>Whatever they said.</blockquote>
If someone quotes someone's post in a forum, it is the same exact thing.
And users can also add their own blockquotes to posts by using the BBCode[quote]
tags too.
It's all blockquotes.
Note: This posts uses<code>
blocks. This may not render properly on all platforms. -
If I change my username after posting a post, the original username is still displayed on Activitypub?
-
altcode@social.vivaldi.netreplied to panlee@community.nodebb.org last edited by
@panzz I can see your updated username from Mastodon.
It’s interesting how NodeBB seems to be able to handle username changes just fine even through ActivityPub.