Sad day. Pain.
-
skipping over the part where you, without any evidence, say it's the admins fault....
Moderators are not Admins, but my statement is that I would not be surprised if a specific circumstance were the case.
If you think it's absurd that unverified naked women have images of themselves on lemmynsfw, idk what to tell you.
-
This post did not contain any content.
...you ask one simple question.
-
skipping over the part where you, without any evidence, say it's the admins fault....
I'm sure the lack of proof is just a coincidence. Maybe someday Banjo will have some.
-
The current way the fediverse exists is all the posts and users only really exist on the host domain. So if it goes down everything is effectively lost. It might exist briefly on some servers, but it takes manual intervention to save it, and it can't be re sent out to anyone.
They provably have already implemented as much "manually intervention" as possible. More than that would become detrimental.
-
Moderators are not Admins, but my statement is that I would not be surprised if a specific circumstance were the case.
If you think it's absurd that unverified naked women have images of themselves on lemmynsfw, idk what to tell you.
I don't think it's absurd that it happened.
i think you underestimate the amount of CSAM that gets put on places like a random Lemmy instance. every admin that allows random people to post has to deal with this.
also, the problem with Lemmy nsfw instance, is the admin has gone missing and there's no one to fix it.
so again, you just have wild accusations of them misshandeling of CSAM.
edit: here's where I'm at. (applying the little I know of US law) The crime here isn't that CSAM got submitted so long as it was dealt with and reported. That's not actually a crime. US law doesn't hold hosting companies responsible for user submitted content. (section 32).
What is a crime is doing nothing about it.
so with that in mind, do you still accuse the moderators of a crime?
we're also talking about the admin gone missing here, not moderators.
-
I don't think it's absurd that it happened.
i think you underestimate the amount of CSAM that gets put on places like a random Lemmy instance. every admin that allows random people to post has to deal with this.
also, the problem with Lemmy nsfw instance, is the admin has gone missing and there's no one to fix it.
so again, you just have wild accusations of them misshandeling of CSAM.
edit: here's where I'm at. (applying the little I know of US law) The crime here isn't that CSAM got submitted so long as it was dealt with and reported. That's not actually a crime. US law doesn't hold hosting companies responsible for user submitted content. (section 32).
What is a crime is doing nothing about it.
so with that in mind, do you still accuse the moderators of a crime?
we're also talking about the admin gone missing here, not moderators.
You gonna tell me about the DOW next?
-
You gonna tell me about the DOW next?
your the one deflecting...
-
You gonna tell me about the DOW next?
So where's the evidence?
-
do you have anything beyond wild speculation?
Nope, just take his word. No need for evidence!
-
So where's the evidence?
Where is YOUR evidence?
-
I'm sure the lack of proof is just a coincidence. Maybe someday Banjo will have some.
Hey; weren’t you just sucking up to KidCrabTrap for denying a request to provide proof?
You people really need to pick a fucking lane.
-
Do I recall you firmly planted up CrabCake’s ass when they denied providing evidence to support the dumbassery when asked?
-
Where is YOUR evidence?
For my lack of claims? I don't need to make one. You made the claim, you give us your proof.
"The earth is flat!"
"No? Prove us wrong."
"WHERE'S YOUR PROOF ITS ROUND?!"
-
Do I recall you firmly planted up CrabCake’s ass when they denied providing evidence to support the dumbassery when asked?
Claims require evidence, I'm sorry that is annoying to you.
-
For my lack of claims? I don't need to make one. You made the claim, you give us your proof.
"The earth is flat!"
"No? Prove us wrong."
"WHERE'S YOUR PROOF ITS ROUND?!"
So you don't have any evidence for YOUR objective statements?
-
So you don't have any evidence for YOUR objective statements?
My statements of?
-
So where's the evidence?
Evidence that I wouldn't be surprised is that I stated so clearly as a primary source.
-
My statements of?
Your assertion that I would be surprised by an instance being shutdown over CP, or otherwise that I am not a proper source for what does or does not surprise me.
-
Your assertion that I would be surprised by an instance being shutdown over CP, or otherwise that I am not a proper source for what does or does not surprise me.
You made the claim they got shut down for it, and then denied and deflected when people wanted proof. How are you this weird?
-
You made the claim they got shut down for it, and then denied and deflected when people wanted proof. How are you this weird?
Incorrect, I never once made that claim.
My claim was that it wouldn't surprise me if they did. It was very clear and requires no evidence.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login