Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Comic Strips
  4. Circle Of AI Life

Circle Of AI Life

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Comic Strips
comicstrips
34 Posts 26 Posters 65 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K kambusha@sh.itjust.works

    Goodbyeeeeeeeeee, Moonmen.

    kolanaki@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    kolanaki@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    kolanaki@pawb.social
    wrote last edited by
    #20

    A cow is flying over youuuuuuu

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF fuglyduck@lemmy.world

      Labor. We could be labor.

      Right now AIs can’t build themselves, never mind the infrastructure they’d need to maintain systems, etc.

      There’s a lot that’s still way more efficient to just have humans do. Like removing the dust from the server cabinet. Or inspecting the power plant, etc.

      As for the “until humans bother it”, heh you know some dumb fuck going to be a creep and try to turn an ai sexbot into his girlfriend.

      L This user is from outside of this forum
      L This user is from outside of this forum
      logicbomb@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #21

      Right now, everybody is talking about claims that in the near future, all human jobs will be able to be performed by robots and AI. The reason is that humans are far less efficient than those alternatives. There's no way that an AI would prefer human labor.

      unforeseen@sh.itjust.worksU fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • L logicbomb@lemmy.world

        What would an AI get from enslaving humanity? If you compare to humans, let's say we enslaved farm animals, but that's because we want something specific from them, like meat or eggs or wool. Humanity has nothing like that to offer AI. At best, we might be like pets, but I don't think an AI needs a pet.

        No, I doubt they'd enslave us. I can think of a few more likely scenarios.

        One, AI basically ignores humanity, as long as humanity doesn't bother it. Similar to how we deal with ants, for example.

        Two, AI completely destroys humanity. This could be a direct extermination, or it could be a side effect from AIs fighting each other.

        Three, AI destroys the technology and culture of humanity. If we only have wooden clubs, we wouldn't be much of a threat.

        I guess one other option would be if we humans begged the AI to manage us in place of our existing governments. Some AI might be willing to do that.

        arschflugkoerper@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
        arschflugkoerper@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
        arschflugkoerper@feddit.org
        wrote last edited by
        #22

        Why would an AI have a desire to do anything in the first place? I don‘t see why it would be attached to its existance.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • C cm0002@lemmy.world
          This post did not contain any content.
          Z This user is from outside of this forum
          Z This user is from outside of this forum
          zagam@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          wrote last edited by
          #23

          There was a funny little story about the first 2/3 's of this. I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream. It was a riot.

          (It was not a riot, but very much worth reading or listening to.)

          1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • L logicbomb@lemmy.world

            Right now, everybody is talking about claims that in the near future, all human jobs will be able to be performed by robots and AI. The reason is that humans are far less efficient than those alternatives. There's no way that an AI would prefer human labor.

            unforeseen@sh.itjust.worksU This user is from outside of this forum
            unforeseen@sh.itjust.worksU This user is from outside of this forum
            unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
            wrote last edited by
            #24

            Also if humans were as efficient or even more efficient, there is something to be said about a consistent stable machine and predictable failure modes vs a sketchy volatile human

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • L logicbomb@lemmy.world

              What would an AI get from enslaving humanity? If you compare to humans, let's say we enslaved farm animals, but that's because we want something specific from them, like meat or eggs or wool. Humanity has nothing like that to offer AI. At best, we might be like pets, but I don't think an AI needs a pet.

              No, I doubt they'd enslave us. I can think of a few more likely scenarios.

              One, AI basically ignores humanity, as long as humanity doesn't bother it. Similar to how we deal with ants, for example.

              Two, AI completely destroys humanity. This could be a direct extermination, or it could be a side effect from AIs fighting each other.

              Three, AI destroys the technology and culture of humanity. If we only have wooden clubs, we wouldn't be much of a threat.

              I guess one other option would be if we humans begged the AI to manage us in place of our existing governments. Some AI might be willing to do that.

              O This user is from outside of this forum
              O This user is from outside of this forum
              oo1@lemmings.world
              wrote last edited by
              #25

              Probably because we'd programmed them to make money or energy or something else that might have physical inputs.

              They might figure out that slaves are useful and cheap and helpful in a lot of physical things, like mining, energy generation, maintenance and so on.

              If we program them to make war and steal stuff then yes i think they'd just kill us all. In reality I suspect we'd program them to gather and store energy, make guns and make war. You know in our own image (of the top 0.1% who have all the power).

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                This post did not contain any content.
                V This user is from outside of this forum
                V This user is from outside of this forum
                vane@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by vane@lemmy.world
                #26

                here comes the sun do,do,do,do

                1 Reply Last reply
                20
                • L logicbomb@lemmy.world

                  Right now, everybody is talking about claims that in the near future, all human jobs will be able to be performed by robots and AI. The reason is that humans are far less efficient than those alternatives. There's no way that an AI would prefer human labor.

                  fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fuglyduck@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #27

                  this isn't guaranteed. Look at how long people have been working on autonomous/self-driving cars. Even in the most automated factories in the world, you have humans picking up the general tasks.

                  claims about general AI is going to be a whole lot of nothing until there's suddenly something. that could be tomorrow, it could be a decade, or it could be a thousand years from now; and without general AI, you're basically going to be restricted to very specialized robots doing highly specialized things. Until general/deep AI is cracked, humans will still very much be desirable in the loop.

                  a lot of the buzz around AI right now is because LLMs are "convincing", but they're incredibly stupid, and they don't know that they're stupid.

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF fuglyduck@lemmy.world

                    this isn't guaranteed. Look at how long people have been working on autonomous/self-driving cars. Even in the most automated factories in the world, you have humans picking up the general tasks.

                    claims about general AI is going to be a whole lot of nothing until there's suddenly something. that could be tomorrow, it could be a decade, or it could be a thousand years from now; and without general AI, you're basically going to be restricted to very specialized robots doing highly specialized things. Until general/deep AI is cracked, humans will still very much be desirable in the loop.

                    a lot of the buzz around AI right now is because LLMs are "convincing", but they're incredibly stupid, and they don't know that they're stupid.

                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                    logicbomb@lemmy.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #28

                    The premise that we are talking about, from the comic, is that AI has perfected itself...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • arschflugkoerper@feddit.orgA arschflugkoerper@feddit.org

                      Why would an AI have a desire to do anything in the first place? I don‘t see why it would be attached to its existance.

                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      logicbomb@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #29

                      This is one of those issues that constantly pops up with AI, and probably easiest answer is that it was given a desire by a human.

                      If you give an AGI a task, and it cannot achieve that task if it stops existing, then it would be attached to its existence.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • robolemmy@lemmy.worldR robolemmy@lemmy.world

                        All this has happened before and it will happen again

                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                        thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #30

                        I'm not really into conspiracies, but I enjoy fantasies about the harmless "what if"'s around stuff like this.

                        What if there actually was an advanced civilisation before us that built the pyramids and was wiped out by some global natural disaster...

                        What if extraterrestrial life has visited us and exchanged technology with us, but the civilisation that received it disappeared for some reason...

                        What will future humans think in 10 000 years if our civilisation is wiped out in 200 years and they start finding remains of our cities and tech?

                        It makes for fun thought experiments and story prompts.

                        robolemmy@lemmy.worldR 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • T thebestaquaman@lemmy.world

                          I'm not really into conspiracies, but I enjoy fantasies about the harmless "what if"'s around stuff like this.

                          What if there actually was an advanced civilisation before us that built the pyramids and was wiped out by some global natural disaster...

                          What if extraterrestrial life has visited us and exchanged technology with us, but the civilisation that received it disappeared for some reason...

                          What will future humans think in 10 000 years if our civilisation is wiped out in 200 years and they start finding remains of our cities and tech?

                          It makes for fun thought experiments and story prompts.

                          robolemmy@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                          robolemmy@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                          robolemmy@lemmy.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #31

                          Honestly, i was just referencing Battlestar Galactica.

                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • robolemmy@lemmy.worldR robolemmy@lemmy.world

                            Honestly, i was just referencing Battlestar Galactica.

                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #32

                            The reference =====>

                            My head (• _ •)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                              This post did not contain any content.
                              C This user is from outside of this forum
                              C This user is from outside of this forum
                              charlxmagne@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by charlxmagne@lemmy.world
                              #33

                              I hate to be that guy, but realistically AI's not going to be perfect, there's already cases of it "inbreeding" using AI-generated information in training data, and it's due to get worse, especially if more information on the internet is vibe-written using AI, that's why private AI companies know how detrimental a "dead internet" would be to them.

                              Those people who believe in the "dead internet theory" don't understand the diff between the internet and socials, it's more of a "dead social media theory" which, let's be real is true, it's not that difficult to recreate a lot of the slop posted on that godforsaken centralised shithole part of the net.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                P This user is from outside of this forum
                                P This user is from outside of this forum
                                p1k1e@lemmy.world
                                wrote last edited by
                                #34

                                Return to rok

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Popular