Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse memes
  3. It's janky AF

It's janky AF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse memes
fedimemes
1 Cross-posts 24 Posts 15 Posters 17 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sarahvalentine@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS sarahvalentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone

    I fuckin hate webp format. Pointless format given the use case coverage between jpg and png.

    widdershins@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
    widdershins@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
    widdershins@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    I usually change the url to ".jpeg?format=jpeg" just in case that formatting takes any extra computing on their end. They want to use a boondoggle I'm gonna use the boondoggle.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • C cm0002@infosec.pub

      Yeah, because the proxy has decided it doesn't like it

      This is what I actually wanted to link to/embed

      https://i.ibb.co/8gHKNsT1/michael-scott-why.gif

      Well actually I originally tried with a direct tenor link

      https://tenor.com/bdBiU.gif

      But it didn't like that either

      sarahvalentine@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
      sarahvalentine@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
      sarahvalentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      Tenor in particular is shitty like that too. If I directly link to a tenor gif on discord, people have to click the link and open a webpage to view the gif. To embed it in discord I have to save it and upload it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      7
      • C cm0002@infosec.pub

        It's a feature of Lemmy where your instance will proxy image links for you, it can be useful in some cases to do things like bypass regional censorships (If you can access your home instance from your country, but not instance lemmy.example.com your home instance can proxy the image from lemmy.example.com so you can still see it (text is handled by federation already, so no proxy required for just text)) or to cache images in case an instance goes down

        But it seems to be poorly implemented where it's end user experience is a pain at best, and the more aggressive it's set the more annoying it is.

        Take for example this instance I'm currently on, infosec.pub, they seem to have it set to aggressively replace all image links including in comments no matter what.

        So now my attempt to reply to this comment https://infosec.pub/comment/20590443 is utterly broken because the image service just doesn't like it despite me just wanting to link to the off-site gif link manually typing the markdown instead.

        This is what that gif looks like proxied:

        https://infosec.pub/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2F8gHKNsT1%2Fmichael-scott-why.gif

        michael@piefed.chrisco.meM This user is from outside of this forum
        michael@piefed.chrisco.meM This user is from outside of this forum
        michael@piefed.chrisco.me
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        Interesting, I can comment on piefed (just did a test) to the comment above. But I get a new tab when I try to see the proxy link.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • sarahvalentine@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS sarahvalentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone

          I fuckin hate webp format. Pointless format given the use case coverage between jpg and png.

          O This user is from outside of this forum
          O This user is from outside of this forum
          owoarchist@pawb.social
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          Yep. And most damning, a lot of my image viewing or editing apps don't like the webp format.

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • widdershins@lemmy.worldW widdershins@lemmy.world

            Is it the "?format= " at the end of a url that usually turns a quick download of a .jpg or .gif into a .webp or .webm download?

            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            thorry@feddit.org
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            I especially hate it when the source is already the same as whatever the target is, but it still breaks the image. Removing the format parameter suddenly makes the image work again, it's so dumb.

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • C cm0002@infosec.pub

              It's a feature of Lemmy where your instance will proxy image links for you, it can be useful in some cases to do things like bypass regional censorships (If you can access your home instance from your country, but not instance lemmy.example.com your home instance can proxy the image from lemmy.example.com so you can still see it (text is handled by federation already, so no proxy required for just text)) or to cache images in case an instance goes down

              But it seems to be poorly implemented where it's end user experience is a pain at best, and the more aggressive it's set the more annoying it is.

              Take for example this instance I'm currently on, infosec.pub, they seem to have it set to aggressively replace all image links including in comments no matter what.

              So now my attempt to reply to this comment https://infosec.pub/comment/20590443 is utterly broken because the image service just doesn't like it despite me just wanting to link to the off-site gif link manually typing the markdown instead.

              This is what that gif looks like proxied:

              https://infosec.pub/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2F8gHKNsT1%2Fmichael-scott-why.gif

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              aeronmelon@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              The proxy link returns a funny error; “too wide.”

              U 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • C cm0002@infosec.pub

                It's a feature of Lemmy where your instance will proxy image links for you, it can be useful in some cases to do things like bypass regional censorships (If you can access your home instance from your country, but not instance lemmy.example.com your home instance can proxy the image from lemmy.example.com so you can still see it (text is handled by federation already, so no proxy required for just text)) or to cache images in case an instance goes down

                But it seems to be poorly implemented where it's end user experience is a pain at best, and the more aggressive it's set the more annoying it is.

                Take for example this instance I'm currently on, infosec.pub, they seem to have it set to aggressively replace all image links including in comments no matter what.

                So now my attempt to reply to this comment https://infosec.pub/comment/20590443 is utterly broken because the image service just doesn't like it despite me just wanting to link to the off-site gif link manually typing the markdown instead.

                This is what that gif looks like proxied:

                https://infosec.pub/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2F8gHKNsT1%2Fmichael-scott-why.gif

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                stellarextract@lemmy.zip
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                A good thing about proxying is that it prevents auto-loading of resources from potentially malicious domains. For instance, I could make an image comment containing an image link to a server I control. When you reply to my comment, since you clearly have seen my comment, I can now look at my server logs and see the IP addresses of everyone who viewed my image. I now know that your IP address is in that list.

                I sortekanin@feddit.dkS 2 Replies Last reply
                19
                • C cm0002@infosec.pub

                  Yeah, because the proxy has decided it doesn't like it

                  This is what I actually wanted to link to/embed

                  https://i.ibb.co/8gHKNsT1/michael-scott-why.gif

                  Well actually I originally tried with a direct tenor link

                  https://tenor.com/bdBiU.gif

                  But it didn't like that either

                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16
                    "code": "validate-width",
                    "msg": "Too wide"
                  }```
                  
                  stripped the headers, your image didn't make it through the infosec.pub proxy. 
                  
                  

                  X-Firefox-Spdy: h2
                  access-control-expose-headers: vary, date, content-length, content-encoding, content-type
                  cache-control: public, max-age=60
                  content-encoding: br
                  content-type: application/json
                  date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 02:10:57 GMT
                  server: nginx
                  vary: accept-encoding, Origin, Access-Control-Request-Method, Access-Control-Request-Headers

                  Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,/;q=0.8
                  Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br, zstd
                  Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
                  Connection: keep-alive
                  DNT: 1
                  Host: infosec.pub
                  Priority: u=0, i
                  Referer: https://piefed.social/
                  Sec-Fetch-Dest: document
                  Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate
                  Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site
                  Sec-Fetch-User: ?1
                  Sec-GPC: 1
                  TE: trailers
                  Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1
                  User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S stellarextract@lemmy.zip

                    A good thing about proxying is that it prevents auto-loading of resources from potentially malicious domains. For instance, I could make an image comment containing an image link to a server I control. When you reply to my comment, since you clearly have seen my comment, I can now look at my server logs and see the IP addresses of everyone who viewed my image. I now know that your IP address is in that list.

                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    Exactly this.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • A aeronmelon@lemmy.world

                      The proxy link returns a funny error; “too wide.”

                      U This user is from outside of this forum
                      U This user is from outside of this forum
                      usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      It's a gif of OP's mom

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • C cm0002@infosec.pub
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        lazynooblet@lazysoci.alL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lazynooblet@lazysoci.alL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        I like it because it protects my privacy.

                        pict-rs (the proxy software) is using ffmpeg in the background to recompile the image which will crash and burn it the image has even the slightest issue/corruption.

                        Pict-rs has options to specify maximum width etc which need adjusting else it blocks too much

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.alL lazynooblet@lazysoci.al

                          I like it because it protects my privacy.

                          pict-rs (the proxy software) is using ffmpeg in the background to recompile the image which will crash and burn it the image has even the slightest issue/corruption.

                          Pict-rs has options to specify maximum width etc which need adjusting else it blocks too much

                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          cm0002@infosec.pub
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          Yea I know there are certainly tangible benefits like privacy, censorship bypass, caching etc

                          But the crux of the issue

                          using ffmpeg in the background to recompile the image which will crash and burn it the image has even the slightest issue/corruption.

                          Does it really need to do all that? IMO it's a proxy and it should just proxy things, not mess with things. Some basic checks at the most to just verify the image is an image and reject non-images, but that's it. If there's a need to also manipulate images then it should be handled separately

                          lazynooblet@lazysoci.alL 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • C cm0002@infosec.pub

                            Yea I know there are certainly tangible benefits like privacy, censorship bypass, caching etc

                            But the crux of the issue

                            using ffmpeg in the background to recompile the image which will crash and burn it the image has even the slightest issue/corruption.

                            Does it really need to do all that? IMO it's a proxy and it should just proxy things, not mess with things. Some basic checks at the most to just verify the image is an image and reject non-images, but that's it. If there's a need to also manipulate images then it should be handled separately

                            lazynooblet@lazysoci.alL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lazynooblet@lazysoci.alL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            The idea is that by saving the image and thumbnail it saves on processing and bandwidth is the server hosting the proxy.

                            Pict-rs is the same image store used by Lemmy for it's own embedded images.

                            I agree with you that there are improvements to be made. I've spent too long troubleshooting images on lazysoci.al.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • S stellarextract@lemmy.zip

                              A good thing about proxying is that it prevents auto-loading of resources from potentially malicious domains. For instance, I could make an image comment containing an image link to a server I control. When you reply to my comment, since you clearly have seen my comment, I can now look at my server logs and see the IP addresses of everyone who viewed my image. I now know that your IP address is in that list.

                              sortekanin@feddit.dkS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sortekanin@feddit.dkS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sortekanin@feddit.dk
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              I've heard this security concern before, but I'm a bit confused about the real attack vector here. I mean let's say you do this - you post an image to some random Lemmy instance and behind the scenes, you gather all the IPs which fetch the image. What malicious thing could you do with that? Genuinely curious.

                              mrnobody@quokk.auM 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • sortekanin@feddit.dkS sortekanin@feddit.dk

                                I've heard this security concern before, but I'm a bit confused about the real attack vector here. I mean let's say you do this - you post an image to some random Lemmy instance and behind the scenes, you gather all the IPs which fetch the image. What malicious thing could you do with that? Genuinely curious.

                                mrnobody@quokk.auM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mrnobody@quokk.auM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mrnobody@quokk.au
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                Hack their Gibson of course.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • C cm0002@infosec.pub
                                  This post did not contain any content.
                                  H This user is from outside of this forum
                                  H This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hirom@beehaw.org
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  Does any client supports proxying images or links? If that's a client settings, users would control whether to use proxy or not, maybe even which proxy to use.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups