Sad day. Pain.
-
Server went down, admin with system access hasn't been seen in months.
This part worries me. Do we know where the server was located? Any chance they were arrested for the site breaking some law? I hope they are okay, whatever happened.
-
Can somebody remind me about how this works again on the fediverse please? When a federated server goes down, does its content and comments - which presumably were circulated to other federated servers - still exist? Can you do something like a raid parity reconstruction?
The current way the fediverse exists is all the posts and users only really exist on the host domain. So if it goes down everything is effectively lost. It might exist briefly on some servers, but it takes manual intervention to save it, and it can't be re sent out to anyone.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I wouldn't have known I blocked that shit. I don't give a fuck.
-
Every time I see a comment from you it is not a very well thought out one.
You have 1 post and 99 comments in 9 months, the fact that I'm being brigaded by such accounts must mean I'm doing something right.
-
do you have anything beyond wild speculation?
I've reported a few sketchy posts to authorities, if the mods are doing there jobs then nothing bad will come of it.
-
Following your preferred communities only, is "living by the algorithm" now?
It was more of an analogy to how we consume our media and why. The almighty Algorithm and no algorithm at all being two extremes, we're closer to the latter.
-
You have 1 post and 99 comments in 9 months, the fact that I'm being brigaded by such accounts must mean I'm doing something right.
I have multiple accounts. That's how fediverse works.
-
I've reported a few sketchy posts to authorities, if the mods are doing there jobs then nothing bad will come of it.
so no... you don't have anything more than wild speculation.
-
so no... you don't have anything more than wild speculation.
You want me to send you links to CP? jfc, dude.
-
You want me to send you links to CP? jfc, dude.
skipping over the part where you, without any evidence, say it's the admins fault....
-
Sort by all, block communities you don’t like. It’s your algorithm, not theirs.
"But if I don't make all communities bend to what I want, they're the bad guy!"
-
skipping over the part where you, without any evidence, say it's the admins fault....
Moderators are not Admins, but my statement is that I would not be surprised if a specific circumstance were the case.
If you think it's absurd that unverified naked women have images of themselves on lemmynsfw, idk what to tell you.
-
This post did not contain any content.
...you ask one simple question.
-
skipping over the part where you, without any evidence, say it's the admins fault....
I'm sure the lack of proof is just a coincidence. Maybe someday Banjo will have some.
-
The current way the fediverse exists is all the posts and users only really exist on the host domain. So if it goes down everything is effectively lost. It might exist briefly on some servers, but it takes manual intervention to save it, and it can't be re sent out to anyone.
They provably have already implemented as much "manually intervention" as possible. More than that would become detrimental.
-
Moderators are not Admins, but my statement is that I would not be surprised if a specific circumstance were the case.
If you think it's absurd that unverified naked women have images of themselves on lemmynsfw, idk what to tell you.
I don't think it's absurd that it happened.
i think you underestimate the amount of CSAM that gets put on places like a random Lemmy instance. every admin that allows random people to post has to deal with this.
also, the problem with Lemmy nsfw instance, is the admin has gone missing and there's no one to fix it.
so again, you just have wild accusations of them misshandeling of CSAM.
edit: here's where I'm at. (applying the little I know of US law) The crime here isn't that CSAM got submitted so long as it was dealt with and reported. That's not actually a crime. US law doesn't hold hosting companies responsible for user submitted content. (section 32).
What is a crime is doing nothing about it.
so with that in mind, do you still accuse the moderators of a crime?
we're also talking about the admin gone missing here, not moderators.
-
I don't think it's absurd that it happened.
i think you underestimate the amount of CSAM that gets put on places like a random Lemmy instance. every admin that allows random people to post has to deal with this.
also, the problem with Lemmy nsfw instance, is the admin has gone missing and there's no one to fix it.
so again, you just have wild accusations of them misshandeling of CSAM.
edit: here's where I'm at. (applying the little I know of US law) The crime here isn't that CSAM got submitted so long as it was dealt with and reported. That's not actually a crime. US law doesn't hold hosting companies responsible for user submitted content. (section 32).
What is a crime is doing nothing about it.
so with that in mind, do you still accuse the moderators of a crime?
we're also talking about the admin gone missing here, not moderators.
You gonna tell me about the DOW next?
-
You gonna tell me about the DOW next?
your the one deflecting...
-
You gonna tell me about the DOW next?
So where's the evidence?
-
do you have anything beyond wild speculation?
Nope, just take his word. No need for evidence!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login