NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

LitePub was mostly a rejection of LD-signatures and started with an outspoken Pleroma developer. The spec itself was basically an incomplete rant that contained very little specification. By reading it, you had no idea what it actually did or how. Which is OK, we've all rejected LD-signatures now and we've got an alternative (object proofs built on elliptic curve cryptography and a fairly simple data normaliser). The only thing you need to be careful with are floats (used by location-aware ActivityPub services). A few of the normalisers have issues with these.

@jdp23 @hrefna > A project like mastodon could define their own conformance profile, of coursethere's an apparent lack of will in doing so. i've actually approached them about taking steps toward making these definitions available, but no bites.i also think there's a political convenience in saying it's "activitypub" instead of "the mastodon protocol". everyone wants to be "activitypub" because that's what has the w3c stamp of legitimacy.

@thisismissem@hachyderm.io @hrefna@hachyderm.io Upstart server implementations -- at your service.