Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Fediverse memes
  4. Big things happening on the butterfly site

Big things happening on the butterfly site

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse memes
fedimemes
74 Posts 36 Posters 18 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C colforge@lemmy.world

    Well it’s one thing to specify you’re wishing harm to her finances. But saying you wish someone ill without specifying absolutely implies wishing them harm.

    F This user is from outside of this forum
    F This user is from outside of this forum
    flax_vert@feddit.uk
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    Nah it kinda just sounds like they don't like her

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • R red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com

      I wish that her socks always feel damp.

      I wish that her sleeves always get wet when she's washing her hands.

      I wish that she always loses when gambling on a fart.

      extremeunicorn@feddit.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
      extremeunicorn@feddit.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
      extremeunicorn@feddit.org
      wrote last edited by extremeunicorn@feddit.org
      #23

      Not trying to defend her at all, but I seriously doubt those are actual examples of the things being said and even if, all of this would cause a regular person psychological distress (or "harm", even if not physical).

      I don't know how Bulesky's TOS are worded exactly, but it feels a bit like that whole "Guns don't kill people, I kill people. With guns." motif.

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • flamingos@feddit.ukF flamingos@feddit.uk

        Context

        P This user is from outside of this forum
        P This user is from outside of this forum
        phegan@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #24

        No matter what people say about Bluesky, I will always say we should be using mastodon, until Bluesky makes good on true federation, it's still a platform that can be controlled.

        irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI 1 Reply Last reply
        41
        • O ohshitson@lemmy.zip

          Have you read Harry Potter? It's not like she can write as It is.

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #25

          I have read the entire Harry Potter series (before she outed herself as being scum). And calling her writing bad is disingenuous. She isn't a bad writer, or more accurately she wasn't. (It's notable that her writing started to degrade very sharply not long after she outed herself as a TERF).

          She is a fucking horrid human being as are Orson Scott Card and Scott Adams along with a few others who's true colors shined through due to the pervasive nature of social media. But to blandly call their works "shitty" just as a lazy dig at them degrades you, not them. It makes your opinion worthless.

          J.K. Rowling is an absolute dipshit asswipe who should be tarred, feathered, and run out on a rail anywhere she goes. And more people should say so as loudly as possible. But the Harry Potter books were beloved by millions for a reason. If only she had gone blind, deaf, and dumb after she finished writing them. 😒

          B S 2 Replies Last reply
          8
          • E earlstilt@feddit.uk

            Broke T&Cs got banned, Rowling is irrelevant in this context. You think the T&Cs breach should be ignored because it’s Rowling?

            ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
            ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
            ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            wrote last edited by
            #26

            2 day old account. First and only engagement is to defend a transphobe...

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            29
            • flamingos@feddit.ukF flamingos@feddit.uk

              Context

              nadru@lemmy.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
              nadru@lemmy.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
              nadru@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #27

              We told them not to use Bluesky and what will eventually happen but they didn't want to listen

              khaleer@sopuli.xyzK irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI 2 Replies Last reply
              52
              • nadru@lemmy.worldN nadru@lemmy.world

                We told them not to use Bluesky and what will eventually happen but they didn't want to listen

                khaleer@sopuli.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
                khaleer@sopuli.xyzK This user is from outside of this forum
                khaleer@sopuli.xyz
                wrote last edited by
                #28

                They literally made tons of account on mastodon just to ignore them for this fucking bootleg of it, called bsky

                1 Reply Last reply
                21
                • extremeunicorn@feddit.orgE extremeunicorn@feddit.org

                  Not trying to defend her at all, but I seriously doubt those are actual examples of the things being said and even if, all of this would cause a regular person psychological distress (or "harm", even if not physical).

                  I don't know how Bulesky's TOS are worded exactly, but it feels a bit like that whole "Guns don't kill people, I kill people. With guns." motif.

                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  wrote last edited by
                  #29

                  Personally, I think wishing harm on people that cause harm is completely OK. As for my wishes, those are inconveniences at most.

                  extremeunicorn@feddit.orgE 1 Reply Last reply
                  4
                  • flamingos@feddit.ukF flamingos@feddit.uk

                    Context

                    thebat@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thebat@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thebat@lemmy.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #30

                    I wish JK Rowling's brain turns into a mush

                    Oh wait that already happens

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    11
                    • nadru@lemmy.worldN nadru@lemmy.world

                      We told them not to use Bluesky and what will eventually happen but they didn't want to listen

                      irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                      irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                      irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                      wrote last edited by
                      #31

                      I have a bluesky account on an alternate server, so they can't ban me for wishing ill on JK Rowling, even if they wanted to.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • P phegan@lemmy.world

                        No matter what people say about Bluesky, I will always say we should be using mastodon, until Bluesky makes good on true federation, it's still a platform that can be controlled.

                        irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                        irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                        irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                        wrote last edited by
                        #32

                        It did make good on true federation.

                        zagorath@aussie.zoneZ M 2 Replies Last reply
                        8
                        • B buddascrayon@lemmy.world

                          I have read the entire Harry Potter series (before she outed herself as being scum). And calling her writing bad is disingenuous. She isn't a bad writer, or more accurately she wasn't. (It's notable that her writing started to degrade very sharply not long after she outed herself as a TERF).

                          She is a fucking horrid human being as are Orson Scott Card and Scott Adams along with a few others who's true colors shined through due to the pervasive nature of social media. But to blandly call their works "shitty" just as a lazy dig at them degrades you, not them. It makes your opinion worthless.

                          J.K. Rowling is an absolute dipshit asswipe who should be tarred, feathered, and run out on a rail anywhere she goes. And more people should say so as loudly as possible. But the Harry Potter books were beloved by millions for a reason. If only she had gone blind, deaf, and dumb after she finished writing them. 😒

                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
                          wrote last edited by
                          #33

                          Eh, her works may not be so poorly written as to be shitty, but they're just a pretty average story with a good editor. Her action scenes were average, tension building slightly above, and her characters were below. I'm sure if you went through the books with a fine tooth comb you could find a witty sentence or interesting paragraph, but nothing that would really stand out.

                          D 1 Reply Last reply
                          4
                          • irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                            It did make good on true federation.

                            zagorath@aussie.zoneZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            zagorath@aussie.zoneZ This user is from outside of this forum
                            zagorath@aussie.zone
                            wrote last edited by
                            #34

                            Isn't their federation really fucking weird though? Like you can't run a federated server unless you're capable of handling 100% of all the posts on the entire platform? That's a pretty huge barrier, and one could argue it's less "federation" and more "mirroring".

                            irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI M 2 Replies Last reply
                            14
                            • zagorath@aussie.zoneZ zagorath@aussie.zone

                              Isn't their federation really fucking weird though? Like you can't run a federated server unless you're capable of handling 100% of all the posts on the entire platform? That's a pretty huge barrier, and one could argue it's less "federation" and more "mirroring".

                              irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                              irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                              irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                              wrote last edited by
                              #35

                              No.
                              Their federation does differ from the fediverse's, essentially, people have PDSes (personal data servers) which are just dumb datastores. These store data like your posts, likes, follows and blocks publicly.

                              AppViews are the other part, these take the data from PDSes and index it, and sort out interactions/notifications.

                              AppViewLite, for example, can be self hosted on any computer, and can be set to only take posts from select users, and discard posts after a while.

                              flamingos@feddit.ukF 1 Reply Last reply
                              5
                              • R red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                Personally, I think wishing harm on people that cause harm is completely OK. As for my wishes, those are inconveniences at most.

                                extremeunicorn@feddit.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
                                extremeunicorn@feddit.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
                                extremeunicorn@feddit.org
                                wrote last edited by
                                #36

                                Maybe, I can't really comment on what she did or "deserves" for it. I just know she made some transphobic remarks in the past, which is messed up. But there's still a difference between someone with a twisted world view and Trump/Putin who actually incarcerate and sponsor torture of people.

                                However, the discussion was on whether something is "harmful" or not and you may actually argue that her BS doesn't physically "harm" anyone either, if you try to make that point.

                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneA ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                                  2 day old account. First and only engagement is to defend a transphobe...

                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jpakx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #37

                                  Thanks Ada ❤

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  5
                                  • extremeunicorn@feddit.orgE extremeunicorn@feddit.org

                                    Maybe, I can't really comment on what she did or "deserves" for it. I just know she made some transphobic remarks in the past, which is messed up. But there's still a difference between someone with a twisted world view and Trump/Putin who actually incarcerate and sponsor torture of people.

                                    However, the discussion was on whether something is "harmful" or not and you may actually argue that her BS doesn't physically "harm" anyone either, if you try to make that point.

                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #38

                                    Rowling spends her considerable fortune to actively influence policy to hurt trans people.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    4
                                    • flamingos@feddit.ukF flamingos@feddit.uk

                                      Context

                                      recursiveparadox@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      recursiveparadox@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      recursiveparadox@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #39

                                      Um what? The hate for JKR is quite active on bsky. OP smoking crack; we hate that bitch.

                                      v01dworks@piefed.socialV comraderachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC 2 Replies Last reply
                                      37
                                      • recursiveparadox@lemmy.worldR recursiveparadox@lemmy.world

                                        Um what? The hate for JKR is quite active on bsky. OP smoking crack; we hate that bitch.

                                        v01dworks@piefed.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        v01dworks@piefed.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        v01dworks@piefed.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #40

                                        Yeah I’ve never seen anyone on Bsky say anything remotely positive about her

                                        Or even neutral lol

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        17
                                        • B burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de

                                          Eh, her works may not be so poorly written as to be shitty, but they're just a pretty average story with a good editor. Her action scenes were average, tension building slightly above, and her characters were below. I'm sure if you went through the books with a fine tooth comb you could find a witty sentence or interesting paragraph, but nothing that would really stand out.

                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dragontypewyvern@midwest.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #41

                                          I too am roundly disappointed at the prose of that children's series largely appealing to children and not adults who haven't moved on after thirty years

                                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular