Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Fediverse memes
  4. They Have No Idea How Fun The Water Park Is!

They Have No Idea How Fun The Water Park Is!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse memes
fedimemes
94 Posts 58 Posters 145 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kierunkowy74@piefed.socialK kierunkowy74@piefed.social

    Well, after 2034 Lemmy can actually be sucessful

    D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    ddplf@szmer.info
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    Lemmy will become a superpower by 2034

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • sunshine@lemmy.caS sunshine@lemmy.ca
      This post did not contain any content.
      Link Preview Image
      underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
      underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
      underpantsweevil@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      Half the success of Lemmy is not becoming the three ring circus of Reddit.

      How long will it last? Idk. I've already seen people complaining about AI bots blowing up their instances with requests, mining for data. I've already heard complaints of bots manipulating votes on certain subs and accounts.

      If that gets worse, Lemmy gets worse.

      But for the time being, we're mostly just a large community of terminally online nerds doing our things and sharing amongst one another, which is what Reddit was supposed to be about.

      T N grrgyle@slrpnk.netG K S 5 Replies Last reply
      94
      • tonytins@pawb.socialT tonytins@pawb.social

        They’re both successful by non-capitalist metrics.

        iheartcheese@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
        iheartcheese@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
        iheartcheese@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        What color socks you rockin

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • sunshine@lemmy.caS sunshine@lemmy.ca
          This post did not contain any content.
          Link Preview Image
          F This user is from outside of this forum
          F This user is from outside of this forum
          fundmecfsresearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          Yes. We don’t need millions of users to be successful. We come on here for a reason, we enjoy it. And to me that’s all that’s needed for success.

          blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.comB flamekebab@piefed.socialF Q 3 Replies Last reply
          36
          • N nukeforyou@lemm.ee

            i dont quite know what it means, but lemm.ee is shutting down.. so... successful ?

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            asetru@feddit.org
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            I'd even say that this illustrates the success even more...

            • lemm.ee shuts down, iirc, because it took too much time and effort to run the instance. Not really a sign of inactivity.
            • the platform keeps going! The whole idea of a federated network works, as a single instance going down doesn't impact other ones. As it happened before, see e.g. feddit.de.

            So Lemmy as a whole is alive and healthy - and successful.

            coelacanth@feddit.nuC 1 Reply Last reply
            29
            • A asetru@feddit.org

              I'd even say that this illustrates the success even more...

              • lemm.ee shuts down, iirc, because it took too much time and effort to run the instance. Not really a sign of inactivity.
              • the platform keeps going! The whole idea of a federated network works, as a single instance going down doesn't impact other ones. As it happened before, see e.g. feddit.de.

              So Lemmy as a whole is alive and healthy - and successful.

              coelacanth@feddit.nuC This user is from outside of this forum
              coelacanth@feddit.nuC This user is from outside of this forum
              coelacanth@feddit.nu
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              Yes, in many ways lemm.ee shutting down is a great example of the intention of a federated network at work, but it is also somewhat of a cautionary tale when it comes to centralisation. Ideally the load would be spread as such that any single instance shutting down would be reasonably painless to adjust for. There were already too many users and communities on .ee, really. Imagine what a disaster .world shutting down would be in the current state of things.

              B grrgyle@slrpnk.netG J 3 Replies Last reply
              11
              • underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU underpantsweevil@lemmy.world

                Half the success of Lemmy is not becoming the three ring circus of Reddit.

                How long will it last? Idk. I've already seen people complaining about AI bots blowing up their instances with requests, mining for data. I've already heard complaints of bots manipulating votes on certain subs and accounts.

                If that gets worse, Lemmy gets worse.

                But for the time being, we're mostly just a large community of terminally online nerds doing our things and sharing amongst one another, which is what Reddit was supposed to be about.

                T This user is from outside of this forum
                T This user is from outside of this forum
                truscape@lemm.ee
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                Decentralized control is probably the biggest asset we have to fight back against these issues. Each instance host has motivation to keep their community in the best shape possible, for users and visitors.

                If one instance is having struggles, you can migrate to another - and instance hosts could share tactics and information about the process of management.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                27
                • F fundmecfsresearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                  Yes. We don’t need millions of users to be successful. We come on here for a reason, we enjoy it. And to me that’s all that’s needed for success.

                  blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                  blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                  blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  I still wouldn't mind 100k monthly active users, or even 75k.

                  That should mean one additional active poster on all the community where I'm alone, and that would be cool

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  29
                  • N nukeforyou@lemm.ee

                    i dont quite know what it means, but lemm.ee is shutting down.. so... successful ?

                    blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                    blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                    blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    It's alright https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45977837

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • tonytins@pawb.socialT tonytins@pawb.social

                      They’re both successful by non-capitalist metrics.

                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                      osrsneedsf2p@lemmy.ml
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      Seems like a cop-out to call "usage rates" a "capitalist metric"

                      tonytins@pawb.socialT T 2 Replies Last reply
                      7
                      • O osrsneedsf2p@lemmy.ml

                        Seems like a cop-out to call "usage rates" a "capitalist metric"

                        tonytins@pawb.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tonytins@pawb.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tonytins@pawb.social
                        wrote last edited by tonytins@pawb.social
                        #20

                        The whole point of federating is to make those metrics obsolete. What matters more is maintaining the community you have, not infinite growth.

                        Q 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU underpantsweevil@lemmy.world

                          Half the success of Lemmy is not becoming the three ring circus of Reddit.

                          How long will it last? Idk. I've already seen people complaining about AI bots blowing up their instances with requests, mining for data. I've already heard complaints of bots manipulating votes on certain subs and accounts.

                          If that gets worse, Lemmy gets worse.

                          But for the time being, we're mostly just a large community of terminally online nerds doing our things and sharing amongst one another, which is what Reddit was supposed to be about.

                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          neidu3@sh.itjust.works
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          terminally online nerds

                          I am offended and in agreement

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          24
                          • sunshine@lemmy.caS sunshine@lemmy.ca
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            Link Preview Image
                            samus12345@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                            samus12345@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                            samus12345@sh.itjust.works
                            wrote last edited by samus12345@sh.itjust.works
                            #22

                            Explorer guy hates when words are misspelled.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • sunshine@lemmy.caS sunshine@lemmy.ca
                              This post did not contain any content.
                              Link Preview Image
                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              I’m pretty sure I got shadow banned twice for just linking Lemmy?

                              AFAIK it’s mostly not Redditors themselves, but the system they’re stuck in.

                              sunshine@lemmy.caS 1 Reply Last reply
                              13
                              • coelacanth@feddit.nuC coelacanth@feddit.nu

                                Yes, in many ways lemm.ee shutting down is a great example of the intention of a federated network at work, but it is also somewhat of a cautionary tale when it comes to centralisation. Ideally the load would be spread as such that any single instance shutting down would be reasonably painless to adjust for. There were already too many users and communities on .ee, really. Imagine what a disaster .world shutting down would be in the current state of things.

                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                Could happen. Imagine the hosting costs of .world exploding if it becomes too big a target.

                                sunshine@lemmy.caS 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • Q quokka@quokk.au

                                  Some people made reddit their identity and anything that threatens it scares them.

                                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tachyontele@piefed.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  What's sad is there's people here that still make reddit their identity.

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  6
                                  • O osrsneedsf2p@lemmy.ml

                                    Seems like a cop-out to call "usage rates" a "capitalist metric"

                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tachyontele@piefed.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    Some people make thier whole identity "capitalism bad".

                                    Q 1 Reply Last reply
                                    5
                                    • F fundmecfsresearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                                      Yes. We don’t need millions of users to be successful. We come on here for a reason, we enjoy it. And to me that’s all that’s needed for success.

                                      flamekebab@piefed.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      flamekebab@piefed.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      flamekebab@piefed.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      Yup!

                                      I really dislike the notion that every website needs to aim to gather everyone on the internet to it - one platform to rule them all.

                                      Can't we just have lots of smaller sites that have their own communities, cultures, and histories?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      7
                                      • underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU underpantsweevil@lemmy.world

                                        Half the success of Lemmy is not becoming the three ring circus of Reddit.

                                        How long will it last? Idk. I've already seen people complaining about AI bots blowing up their instances with requests, mining for data. I've already heard complaints of bots manipulating votes on certain subs and accounts.

                                        If that gets worse, Lemmy gets worse.

                                        But for the time being, we're mostly just a large community of terminally online nerds doing our things and sharing amongst one another, which is what Reddit was supposed to be about.

                                        grrgyle@slrpnk.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        grrgyle@slrpnk.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        grrgyle@slrpnk.net
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        We might eventually have to get more exclusive, or have separate "public" and "private" modes/communities, maybe like how masto handles post visibility...

                                        I'm not sure if the open internet can ever be fully trusted, especially now with roving packs of predatory crawlers scraping for genuine human OC for their plagiarism machines.

                                        irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI nutomic@lemmy.mlN 2 Replies Last reply
                                        8
                                        • coelacanth@feddit.nuC coelacanth@feddit.nu

                                          Yes, in many ways lemm.ee shutting down is a great example of the intention of a federated network at work, but it is also somewhat of a cautionary tale when it comes to centralisation. Ideally the load would be spread as such that any single instance shutting down would be reasonably painless to adjust for. There were already too many users and communities on .ee, really. Imagine what a disaster .world shutting down would be in the current state of things.

                                          grrgyle@slrpnk.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          grrgyle@slrpnk.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          grrgyle@slrpnk.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          Honestly I wonder, hypothetically, if .world shutting down right now would actually be better for the fediverse.

                                          If it continues to be seen as the "default instance" it just becomes a bigger point of failure. And arguably more pernicious, becomes the cultural equivalent of a reddit.

                                          Then I start to think crazy thoughts like what if private capital took an interest in a giant instance. Idk, I'm being way too paranoid I know I know

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular