They are absolutely equivalent and it’s ridiculous to argue otherwise.

What? Wanting misfortune to befall someone is literally what wishing someone ill means?

No they're not? Wanting the next Harry Potter thing to flop and her lose a bunch of money is wishing misfortune, but it's hardly wishing harm.

My mistake, the misfortune you are wishing is harmless misfortune, I see now

Well it’s one thing to specify you’re wishing harm to her finances. But saying you wish someone ill without specifying absolutely implies wishing them harm.

The bird site was broken before the psycho took over. Just brought the same shit to the new site.

I hope she gets Parkinson's and cant write anymore.

But saying you wish someone ill without specifying absolutely implies wishing them harm.

IDK, I've never taken it to mean wanting harm.

I hope JK Rowling gets everything she deserves out of life. I hope life treats her as she does others. I wish upon her the consequences of her actions and words.

i hope the mold kills her horribly

I wish that her socks always feel damp.

I wish that her sleeves always get wet when she's washing her hands.

I wish that she always loses when gambling on a fart.

lol. She’s rich and safe. Stop stressing yourself out about every little thing and go firebomb an health insurance office in her name.

JK can Rot in Piss for all I care.

Have you read Harry Potter? It's not like she can write as It is.

I just did so on Bluesky. With a "may she rot in hell" cherry on top.

They can suspend me forever for all I care.

This is why decentralisation is important. I assume the poster has no way to change Bluesky sites?

Like this is why they should join a Fediverse instance. Like blahaj.zone will probably suit them

Nah it kinda just sounds like they don't like her

Not trying to defend her at all, but I seriously doubt those are actual examples of the things being said and even if, all of this would cause a regular person psychological distress (or "harm", even if not physical).

I don't know how Bulesky's TOS are worded exactly, but it feels a bit like that whole "Guns don't kill people, I kill people. With guns." motif.

No matter what people say about Bluesky, I will always say we should be using mastodon, until Bluesky makes good on true federation, it's still a platform that can be controlled.

I have read the entire Harry Potter series (before she outed herself as being scum). And calling her writing bad is disingenuous. She isn't a bad writer, or more accurately she wasn't. (It's notable that her writing started to degrade very sharply not long after she outed herself as a TERF).

She is a fucking horrid human being as are Orson Scott Card and Scott Adams along with a few others who's true colors shined through due to the pervasive nature of social media. But to blandly call their works "shitty" just as a lazy dig at them degrades you, not them. It makes your opinion worthless.

J.K. Rowling is an absolute dipshit asswipe who should be tarred, feathered, and run out on a rail anywhere she goes. And more people should say so as loudly as possible. But the Harry Potter books were beloved by millions for a reason. If only she had gone blind, deaf, and dumb after she finished writing them.