currently i'm confused a bit. a few month ago i talked to the community about publicKey in the actors profile.
-
currently i'm confused a bit. a few month ago i talked to the community about publicKey in the actors profile.
I think @steve was answering, that the property publicKeyPem has the namespace https://w3id.org/security#.i'm using https://w3id.org/security#owner, but forgott, ehere i've found that info. it looks like that https://w3id.org/security#owner is not existing.
Is there a valid document that describes that publicKey stuff ?
-
naturzukunft@mastodon.socialreplied to naturzukunft@mastodon.social last edited by
the owner attribute idea maybe comes from here:
https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/activitypub/#publicKey
the sample is strange, i cannot find one of this properties:
https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#publicKey
https://w3id.org/security/v1#publicKey
https://w3id.org/security#publicKeyhttps://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#owner
https://w3id.org/security/v1#owner
https://w3id.org/security#owner -
steve@social.technoetic.comreplied to naturzukunft@mastodon.social last edited by
@naturzukunft Is this what you need? https://w3id.org/security/v1
-
naturzukunft@mastodon.socialreplied to steve@social.technoetic.com last edited by
@steve
Hm, maybebut i'm still confused, because there is defined:
a) "owner": {"@ID": "sec:owner", "@type": "@ID"},
b) "publicKey": {"@ID": "sec:publicKey", "@type": "@ID"},means (as i understood)
a) 'owner' is -> https://w3id.org/security#owner
b) 'publicKey' is -> https://w3id.org/security#publicKeybut i cannot find a definition for https://w3id.org/security#owner & https://w3id.org/security#publicKey
-
mro@digitalcourage.socialreplied to naturzukunft@mastodon.social last edited by
Hi @naturzukunft @steve @ID @type,
owner is long deprecated and useless however treated mandatory. That is where reason ends and rituals and obedience take over. https://codeberg.org/seppo/seppo/commit/db8028aMind also the language thingy https://codeberg.org/seppo/seppo/commit/c41f560
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to mro@digitalcourage.social last edited by
@mro @naturzukunft @steve https://w3c-ccg.github.io/security-vocab/#owner
yes this is an old draft from 2 years ago when the "security vocab" was still under the credentials community group (ccg) instead of the verifiable credentials working group (vcwg)