Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
activitypubactivitystreamsfedidevfediverse
4 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • reiver@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    reiver@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    reiver@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

    To me, it feels like there should have been something that is a common parent of both 'Object' and 'Link'.

    That just had the "name", "nameMap", and "preview" fields (along with "id" and "type, of course) โ€” since that is what 'Object' and 'Link' share in common.

    I'll just call this common parent: 'Entity'.

    ...

    It could have even been an opportunity to talk about how to handle unknown types.

    #ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #Fediverse

    haitchfive@oldbytes.spaceH trwnh@mastodon.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • tag-activitypub@relay.fedi.buzzT tag-activitypub@relay.fedi.buzz shared this topic
    • reiver@mastodon.socialR reiver@mastodon.social

      With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

      To me, it feels like there should have been something that is a common parent of both 'Object' and 'Link'.

      That just had the "name", "nameMap", and "preview" fields (along with "id" and "type, of course) โ€” since that is what 'Object' and 'Link' share in common.

      I'll just call this common parent: 'Entity'.

      ...

      It could have even been an opportunity to talk about how to handle unknown types.

      #ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #Fediverse

      haitchfive@oldbytes.spaceH This user is from outside of this forum
      haitchfive@oldbytes.spaceH This user is from outside of this forum
      haitchfive@oldbytes.space
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @reiver Did you and I discuss queryfy a while ago, or was it one of my other projects?

      Just wondering whether I owe you a heads up since queryfy has been bumped up to v0.3.0

      reiver@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • haitchfive@oldbytes.spaceH haitchfive@oldbytes.space

        @reiver Did you and I discuss queryfy a while ago, or was it one of my other projects?

        Just wondering whether I owe you a heads up since queryfy has been bumped up to v0.3.0

        reiver@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        reiver@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        reiver@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @haitchfive

        I don't think it was me, but โ€” it seems interesting.

        https://github.com/ha1tch/quertfy

        .

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • reiver@mastodon.socialR reiver@mastodon.social

          With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

          To me, it feels like there should have been something that is a common parent of both 'Object' and 'Link'.

          That just had the "name", "nameMap", and "preview" fields (along with "id" and "type, of course) โ€” since that is what 'Object' and 'Link' share in common.

          I'll just call this common parent: 'Entity'.

          ...

          It could have even been an opportunity to talk about how to handle unknown types.

          #ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #Fediverse

          trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          trwnh@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @reiver i think the disjunction between Object and Link was actually unnecessary. https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/666

          i also think there's too much emphasis on types when there really shouldn't be -- it's the *properties* that you end up using almost all of the time. pretty much the only types that actually matter are the Activity types (because you can't infer those).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

          With your input, this post could be even better ๐Ÿ’—

          Register Login
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups