Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. connectedplaces.online/reports/fediverse-report-148-on-protocol-governance/On the complexities of protocol governance.

connectedplaces.online/reports/fediverse-report-148-on-protocol-governance/On the complexities of protocol governance.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
chatonsfediversefediversactivitypubw3c
2 Posts 2 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • snoopy@peculiar.floristS This user is from outside of this forum
    snoopy@peculiar.floristS This user is from outside of this forum
    snoopy@peculiar.florist
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    connectedplaces.online/reports/fediverse-report-148-on-protocol-governance/

    On the complexities of protocol governance.

    There are only two organisations that are active in the fediverse that are a paid member of the W3C: Meta and the Social Web Foundation.
    With the Social Web Foundation also receiving funding from Meta, the company that built Threads now has more institutional standing in ActivityPub governance than any of the organisations actually building open fediverse software.
    Mastodon gGmbH, Framasoft, and others are not W3C members and cannot participate in the Working Group unless they are invited.
    #CHATONS #fediverse #fedivers #ActivityPub #w3c #Mastodon #Peertube #Lemmy #mBin #Piefed #NodeBB #Iceshrimp #Pixelfed #Loops

    klu9@ohai.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • tag-activitypub@relay.fedi.buzzT tag-activitypub@relay.fedi.buzz shared this topic
    • snoopy@peculiar.floristS snoopy@peculiar.florist

      connectedplaces.online/reports/fediverse-report-148-on-protocol-governance/

      On the complexities of protocol governance.

      There are only two organisations that are active in the fediverse that are a paid member of the W3C: Meta and the Social Web Foundation.
      With the Social Web Foundation also receiving funding from Meta, the company that built Threads now has more institutional standing in ActivityPub governance than any of the organisations actually building open fediverse software.
      Mastodon gGmbH, Framasoft, and others are not W3C members and cannot participate in the Working Group unless they are invited.
      #CHATONS #fediverse #fedivers #ActivityPub #w3c #Mastodon #Peertube #Lemmy #mBin #Piefed #NodeBB #Iceshrimp #Pixelfed #Loops

      klu9@ohai.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      klu9@ohai.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      klu9@ohai.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @snoopy

      TIL I had no idea who actually controlled #ActivityPub . Concerning to hear that #Fediverse developers don't really have a hand in it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups