They said it wouldn't happen but I held onto hope 🥹
-
They said it wouldn't happen but I held onto hope 🥹
So happy to see Apple do the right thing for users here, even if it took way longer than it should should have.
RE: https://www.threads.net/@davidimel/post/DHLtYmzgK-m -
They said it wouldn't happen but I held onto hope 🥹
So happy to see Apple do the right thing for users here, even if it took way longer than it should should have.
RE: https://www.threads.net/@davidimel/post/DHLtYmzgK-mAlright, now make FaceTime a standard like you promised
-
They said it wouldn't happen but I held onto hope 🥹
So happy to see Apple do the right thing for users here, even if it took way longer than it should should have.
RE: https://www.threads.net/@davidimel/post/DHLtYmzgK-mI feel like a lot of it here is on Google's end no? The spec didn't include encryption as google implemented it separately. I doubt Apple would have been able to use that encryption cause it's not public. The new spec which google updated included it, so Apple is updating it and alongside that including encryption. Seems like it's more like it took Google a fair while to include it than Apple's fault
-
I feel like a lot of it here is on Google's end no? The spec didn't include encryption as google implemented it separately. I doubt Apple would have been able to use that encryption cause it's not public. The new spec which google updated included it, so Apple is updating it and alongside that including encryption. Seems like it's more like it took Google a fair while to include it than Apple's fault
Almost like if Apple decided to work with Google when RCS became a standard we would've had E2EE in the standard early, huh?
-
Almost like if Apple decided to work with Google when RCS became a standard we would've had E2EE in the standard early, huh?
Fair enough
-
Fair enough
To be clear, lots of blame to hand to Google in this duopoly, but they've been *relatively* better on RCS
