Am wondering if it'd make sense to have a dedicated Reply activity, such that a reply becomes Reply(Note) instead of Create(Note)
-
julian@community.nodebb.orgreplied to thisismissem@hachyderm.io on last edited by
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io there's no functional difference though no? I think @trwnh@mastodon.social's 7888 already discusses that flow and it works ok with Create...
-
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to julian@community.nodebb.org on last edited by
@julian @thisismissem also https://w3id.org/fep/7458 covers usage of the replies collection, with similar logic
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to thisismissem@hachyderm.io on last edited by
@thisismissem @julian the one potential advantage of having a dedicated Reply activity is that it allows for quick pattern-matching at the activity level (similar to Like/Announce), but it comes at a semantic cost of reifying replies as an activity rather than as metadata or as a link relation. which i don't think they should be dedicated activities.
-
thisismissem@hachyderm.ioreplied to trwnh@mastodon.social on last edited by
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to thisismissem@hachyderm.io on last edited by
@thisismissem @julian that can be done with any activity
-
-
mikedev@fediversity.sitereplied to silverpill@mitra.social on last edited byI don't mind.
-
@mikedev draft: https://codeberg.org/silverpill/feps/src/branch/main/171b/fep-171b.md
It is based on the original text, but I added several clarifications, and also some new requirements:
- Compatibility with FEP-7888
- The recommended type of collection isContext
- Using FEP-c7d3 framework for authenticationBut it still should be compatible with your implementation. If it will diverge in the future, I'll pick a different name
-
mikedev@fediversity.sitereplied to silverpill@mitra.social last edited byI can foresee a lot of confusion over the mingling of '@context', 'context', and 'Context'. Do you have a recommended LD namespace for the latter, and should it be a type with multiple properties (['OrderedCollection', 'Context'])? It wasn't obvious from the document.
Otherwise that looks good.