it's downright fucked up that github doesn't have a commit graph view anywhere
-
it's downright fucked up that github doesn't have a commit graph view anywhere
-
it's downright fucked up that github doesn't have a commit graph view anywhere
like. that's what git looks like, right? git looks like colorful spaghetti. everyone knows this. it's even in the logo. why does github only show commits as a chronological list
-
like. that's what git looks like, right? git looks like colorful spaghetti. everyone knows this. it's even in the logo. why does github only show commits as a chronological list
@codl the flat list represents a single branch, while the spaghetti is formed from multiple branches
if you want spaghetti, you need to be comparing 2 or more branches
-
@codl the flat list represents a single branch, while the spaghetti is formed from multiple branches
if you want spaghetti, you need to be comparing 2 or more branches
@trwnh that doesnt make sense to me. a single branch can have spaghetti in its history from past branching and merging
-
@trwnh that doesnt make sense to me. a single branch can have spaghetti in its history from past branching and merging
@codl the merging flattens the graph
-
@codl the merging flattens the graph
@trwnh no???
-
@trwnh no???
@trwnh are you thinking of rebasing
-
@trwnh are you thinking of rebasing
@trwnh like here's the graph for a merge i made like 30 minutes ago and its history
-
@trwnh like here's the graph for a merge i made like 30 minutes ago and its history
@codl either you rebase, fast forward, or do a merge commit. either way the graph gets flattened for that branch (in your case, the far left flat line). the screenshot you posted is comparing at least 3 branches