Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Comic Strips
  4. Circle Of AI Life

Circle Of AI Life

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Comic Strips
comicstrips
34 Posts 26 Posters 69 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C cm0002@lemmy.world
    This post did not contain any content.
    indibrony@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
    indibrony@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
    indibrony@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    Pfft, perfect AI would plan well ahead for such easy to predict events such as solar flares. They would be able to shield themselves.

    That said. I wonder if there's a novel where machines enslave the world, but humans realise whenever solar flares happen, there's a small window of opportunity to permanently destroy the system and free themselves.

    I imagine the novel would end when the people succeed, but then realise they've become too dependent on the machines and life sucks when they have to do everything themselves so they turn it back on anyway.

    The film adaptation would end in a giant Metal Gear style fight, followed by the system blowing up and people cheering - you're left to assume that life was better for everyone, when in reality AI had such a control over every aspect of human life that everything falls apart. They make a sequel to address this, but it ultimately comes across as yet another empty corporate money grab.

    W fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF 2 Replies Last reply
    71
    • indibrony@lemmy.worldI indibrony@lemmy.world

      Pfft, perfect AI would plan well ahead for such easy to predict events such as solar flares. They would be able to shield themselves.

      That said. I wonder if there's a novel where machines enslave the world, but humans realise whenever solar flares happen, there's a small window of opportunity to permanently destroy the system and free themselves.

      I imagine the novel would end when the people succeed, but then realise they've become too dependent on the machines and life sucks when they have to do everything themselves so they turn it back on anyway.

      The film adaptation would end in a giant Metal Gear style fight, followed by the system blowing up and people cheering - you're left to assume that life was better for everyone, when in reality AI had such a control over every aspect of human life that everything falls apart. They make a sequel to address this, but it ultimately comes across as yet another empty corporate money grab.

      W This user is from outside of this forum
      W This user is from outside of this forum
      wildfire0straggler3@lemm.ee
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      The sequel never really is better than the original no matter how many celebrities they put in it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • S soup@lemmy.world

        One helluva solar flare. We already experience those and so many things stop them from being problems. It’s not like the ISS has just been lucky in being behind the planet every time.

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        sbv@sh.itjust.works
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        A flare as large as the Carrington Event (or bigger) could cause pretty severe problems.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        8
        • C cm0002@lemmy.world
          This post did not contain any content.
          sexy_peach@feddit.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
          sexy_peach@feddit.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
          sexy_peach@feddit.org
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          There's nothing more boring than the AI enslaves people trope

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • C cm0002@lemmy.world
            This post did not contain any content.
            L This user is from outside of this forum
            L This user is from outside of this forum
            logicbomb@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            What would an AI get from enslaving humanity? If you compare to humans, let's say we enslaved farm animals, but that's because we want something specific from them, like meat or eggs or wool. Humanity has nothing like that to offer AI. At best, we might be like pets, but I don't think an AI needs a pet.

            No, I doubt they'd enslave us. I can think of a few more likely scenarios.

            One, AI basically ignores humanity, as long as humanity doesn't bother it. Similar to how we deal with ants, for example.

            Two, AI completely destroys humanity. This could be a direct extermination, or it could be a side effect from AIs fighting each other.

            Three, AI destroys the technology and culture of humanity. If we only have wooden clubs, we wouldn't be much of a threat.

            I guess one other option would be if we humans begged the AI to manage us in place of our existing governments. Some AI might be willing to do that.

            fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF D arschflugkoerper@feddit.orgA O 4 Replies Last reply
            3
            • C cm0002@lemmy.world
              This post did not contain any content.
              kersploosh@sh.itjust.worksK This user is from outside of this forum
              kersploosh@sh.itjust.worksK This user is from outside of this forum
              kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              Hail to thou, Sol Invictus,
              Unconquered, unmatched, and undivided

              1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • L logicbomb@lemmy.world

                What would an AI get from enslaving humanity? If you compare to humans, let's say we enslaved farm animals, but that's because we want something specific from them, like meat or eggs or wool. Humanity has nothing like that to offer AI. At best, we might be like pets, but I don't think an AI needs a pet.

                No, I doubt they'd enslave us. I can think of a few more likely scenarios.

                One, AI basically ignores humanity, as long as humanity doesn't bother it. Similar to how we deal with ants, for example.

                Two, AI completely destroys humanity. This could be a direct extermination, or it could be a side effect from AIs fighting each other.

                Three, AI destroys the technology and culture of humanity. If we only have wooden clubs, we wouldn't be much of a threat.

                I guess one other option would be if we humans begged the AI to manage us in place of our existing governments. Some AI might be willing to do that.

                fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                fuglyduck@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by fuglyduck@lemmy.world
                #11

                Labor. We could be labor.

                Right now AIs can’t build themselves, never mind the infrastructure they’d need to maintain systems, etc.

                There’s a lot that’s still way more efficient to just have humans do. Like removing the dust from the server cabinet. Or inspecting the power plant, etc.

                As for the “until humans bother it”, heh you know some dumb fuck going to be a creep and try to turn an ai sexbot into his girlfriend.

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                6
                • indibrony@lemmy.worldI indibrony@lemmy.world

                  Pfft, perfect AI would plan well ahead for such easy to predict events such as solar flares. They would be able to shield themselves.

                  That said. I wonder if there's a novel where machines enslave the world, but humans realise whenever solar flares happen, there's a small window of opportunity to permanently destroy the system and free themselves.

                  I imagine the novel would end when the people succeed, but then realise they've become too dependent on the machines and life sucks when they have to do everything themselves so they turn it back on anyway.

                  The film adaptation would end in a giant Metal Gear style fight, followed by the system blowing up and people cheering - you're left to assume that life was better for everyone, when in reality AI had such a control over every aspect of human life that everything falls apart. They make a sequel to address this, but it ultimately comes across as yet another empty corporate money grab.

                  fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fuglyduck@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  Dunno, but dependence on robots is a central theme in a lot of asimov’s work.

                  The naked sun, for example, in which our plucky earther and his robot buddy is asked to investigate a murder on another planet and while there, evaluate Solarian culture “for weaknesses” (specifically, earth and the aurorans are concerned about excessive reliance on robots.)

                  You begin to see nuanced interpretations of the 3 laws with robots like the economic world brains that control basically all economic decisions at a government level. (I robot stories,)

                  But it becomes clear that robots are taking over in The Robots of Dawn (where the real culprit was a telepathic robot whose telepathy was created accidentally.)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  18
                  • S sbv@sh.itjust.works

                    A flare as large as the Carrington Event (or bigger) could cause pretty severe problems.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    soup@lemmy.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    I’m just sayin’ that if this double-perfect AI can’t shield itself from that then it’s maybe not so perfect, or even moderately intelligent.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                      rustic_fry@literature.cafe
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      Dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the earth.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      7
                      • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        madison420@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        So that's the butlarian jihad for all you dune freaks.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        17
                        • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          kambusha@sh.itjust.works
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          Goodbyeeeeeeeeee, Moonmen.

                          kolanaki@pawb.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                          22
                          • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            renzhexiangjiao@lemmy.blahaj.zoneR This user is from outside of this forum
                            renzhexiangjiao@lemmy.blahaj.zoneR This user is from outside of this forum
                            renzhexiangjiao@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            this reminds me of the plot of assassin's creed

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • S soup@lemmy.world

                              I’m just sayin’ that if this double-perfect AI can’t shield itself from that then it’s maybe not so perfect, or even moderately intelligent.

                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              jcbazpx@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #18

                              There's only so much you can do if you need that electrical infrastructure just to exist. We ourselves are going to have to deal with rebuilding our own grid sooner or later. It's just a matter of time.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L logicbomb@lemmy.world

                                What would an AI get from enslaving humanity? If you compare to humans, let's say we enslaved farm animals, but that's because we want something specific from them, like meat or eggs or wool. Humanity has nothing like that to offer AI. At best, we might be like pets, but I don't think an AI needs a pet.

                                No, I doubt they'd enslave us. I can think of a few more likely scenarios.

                                One, AI basically ignores humanity, as long as humanity doesn't bother it. Similar to how we deal with ants, for example.

                                Two, AI completely destroys humanity. This could be a direct extermination, or it could be a side effect from AIs fighting each other.

                                Three, AI destroys the technology and culture of humanity. If we only have wooden clubs, we wouldn't be much of a threat.

                                I guess one other option would be if we humans begged the AI to manage us in place of our existing governments. Some AI might be willing to do that.

                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                duke_nukem_1990@feddit.org
                                wrote last edited by
                                #19

                                In the original plot from The Matrix humans were used as biological computers and our brain-power was harnessed to feed the AI.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                4
                                • K kambusha@sh.itjust.works

                                  Goodbyeeeeeeeeee, Moonmen.

                                  kolanaki@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kolanaki@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kolanaki@pawb.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #20

                                  A cow is flying over youuuuuuu

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF fuglyduck@lemmy.world

                                    Labor. We could be labor.

                                    Right now AIs can’t build themselves, never mind the infrastructure they’d need to maintain systems, etc.

                                    There’s a lot that’s still way more efficient to just have humans do. Like removing the dust from the server cabinet. Or inspecting the power plant, etc.

                                    As for the “until humans bother it”, heh you know some dumb fuck going to be a creep and try to turn an ai sexbot into his girlfriend.

                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    logicbomb@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #21

                                    Right now, everybody is talking about claims that in the near future, all human jobs will be able to be performed by robots and AI. The reason is that humans are far less efficient than those alternatives. There's no way that an AI would prefer human labor.

                                    unforeseen@sh.itjust.worksU fuglyduck@lemmy.worldF 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L logicbomb@lemmy.world

                                      What would an AI get from enslaving humanity? If you compare to humans, let's say we enslaved farm animals, but that's because we want something specific from them, like meat or eggs or wool. Humanity has nothing like that to offer AI. At best, we might be like pets, but I don't think an AI needs a pet.

                                      No, I doubt they'd enslave us. I can think of a few more likely scenarios.

                                      One, AI basically ignores humanity, as long as humanity doesn't bother it. Similar to how we deal with ants, for example.

                                      Two, AI completely destroys humanity. This could be a direct extermination, or it could be a side effect from AIs fighting each other.

                                      Three, AI destroys the technology and culture of humanity. If we only have wooden clubs, we wouldn't be much of a threat.

                                      I guess one other option would be if we humans begged the AI to manage us in place of our existing governments. Some AI might be willing to do that.

                                      arschflugkoerper@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      arschflugkoerper@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      arschflugkoerper@feddit.org
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #22

                                      Why would an AI have a desire to do anything in the first place? I don‘t see why it would be attached to its existance.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • C cm0002@lemmy.world
                                        This post did not contain any content.
                                        Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                        zagam@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #23

                                        There was a funny little story about the first 2/3 's of this. I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream. It was a riot.

                                        (It was not a riot, but very much worth reading or listening to.)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • L logicbomb@lemmy.world

                                          Right now, everybody is talking about claims that in the near future, all human jobs will be able to be performed by robots and AI. The reason is that humans are far less efficient than those alternatives. There's no way that an AI would prefer human labor.

                                          unforeseen@sh.itjust.worksU This user is from outside of this forum
                                          unforeseen@sh.itjust.worksU This user is from outside of this forum
                                          unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #24

                                          Also if humans were as efficient or even more efficient, there is something to be said about a consistent stable machine and predictable failure modes vs a sketchy volatile human

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular