Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. General Discussion
  4. AP Test (community.nodebb.org)
  5. Chats are now federating as limited-visibility posts on the fediverse

Chats are now federating as limited-visibility posts on the fediverse

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved AP Test (community.nodebb.org)
activitypubnodebbactivitypchats
18 Posts 7 Posters 137 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jdp23@blahaj.zone
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Seems to work! WHy did you think it didn't?

    Sharkey is kind of a mess these days, sigh.

    @julian@community.nodebb.org

    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ jdp23@blahaj.zone

      Seems to work! WHy did you think it didn't?

      Sharkey is kind of a mess these days, sigh.

      @julian@community.nodebb.org

      julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
      julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
      julian@community.nodebb.org
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      @jdp23@blahaj.zone ah okay great! Just wasn't sure because I didn't get your replies (if any, but now I'm guessing you probably just +1'd them which I don't handle yet!)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jdp23@blahaj.zone
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        @julian@community.nodebb.org no, no, i just edited my post, I was confused ... in fact it wasn't working, I'll try from a Mastodon account

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ jdp23@blahaj.zone

          @julian@community.nodebb.org yeah, horrible UX. talk about violating the principle of least surprised! it's happened to me more than once.

          Sharkey bizarrely has almost the inverse UX problem. The 'to' list is separate, as it should be ... but if it's more than a couple of people it extends off the right side of the screen (at least in Firefox) and there's no way to scroll. So I replied to a DM that had five people in it, deleted their mentions from the main text ... and still replied to them because they were on the To line, just not visible.

          And then I'm pretty sure that if you DM reply on Mastodon to the Sharkey message, accounts show up in the reply even though there's absolutely no evidence that they were on the message you were replying to (because the mentions weren't there in the text, and Mastodon doesn't show a separate To line, or something like that).
          @stefan@stefanbohacek.online I think you ran into this as well?

          Easy. Just like email. Yeah right. lolsob.

          nexus@gts-test.thenexus.todayN This user is from outside of this forum
          nexus@gts-test.thenexus.todayN This user is from outside of this forum
          nexus@gts-test.thenexus.today
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Speaking of the principle of least surprise ... @jdp23 is post got auto-boosted by @activitypub but there wasn't anything that indicated to me that was going to happen.

          And, from GoToSocial, the topic's subject shows up nicely from Julian, @jdp23's reply lost the topic, but it showed back up in Julian's reply to the (topicless) reply ... Behavior's similar on Sharkey, although the subject doesn't render as nicely (but it's still readable)

          With the @thenexusofprivacy account on Glitch, the subjects don't show up at all -- not even in Julian's original post.

          @stefan @julian

          thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nexus@gts-test.thenexus.todayN nexus@gts-test.thenexus.today

            Speaking of the principle of least surprise ... @jdp23 is post got auto-boosted by @activitypub but there wasn't anything that indicated to me that was going to happen.

            And, from GoToSocial, the topic's subject shows up nicely from Julian, @jdp23's reply lost the topic, but it showed back up in Julian's reply to the (topicless) reply ... Behavior's similar on Sharkey, although the subject doesn't render as nicely (but it's still readable)

            With the @thenexusofprivacy account on Glitch, the subjects don't show up at all -- not even in Julian's original post.

            @stefan @julian

            thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
            thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
            thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            And also speaking of biolations of the principle of least surprise: it's interesitng to look at how these posts do and don't show up on the Discourse thread at https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/chats-are-now-federating-as-limited-visibility-posts-on-the-fediverse/4650/15 ...

            • Julian's posts are all fine, no surprise, but a good sign for Discourse/NodeBB federation.

            • @jdp23's posts show up twice on that thread.

            • @nexus;s post didn't show up

            Now how about this post from Mastodon?

            @stefan @julian

            stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jdp23@blahaj.zoneJ jdp23@blahaj.zone

              @julian@community.nodebb.org yeah, horrible UX. talk about violating the principle of least surprised! it's happened to me more than once.

              Sharkey bizarrely has almost the inverse UX problem. The 'to' list is separate, as it should be ... but if it's more than a couple of people it extends off the right side of the screen (at least in Firefox) and there's no way to scroll. So I replied to a DM that had five people in it, deleted their mentions from the main text ... and still replied to them because they were on the To line, just not visible.

              And then I'm pretty sure that if you DM reply on Mastodon to the Sharkey message, accounts show up in the reply even though there's absolutely no evidence that they were on the message you were replying to (because the mentions weren't there in the text, and Mastodon doesn't show a separate To line, or something like that).
              @stefan@stefanbohacek.online I think you ran into this as well?

              Easy. Just like email. Yeah right. lolsob.

              stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
              stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
              stefan@stefanbohacek.online
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              @jdp23 @julian

              "I think you ran into this as well?"

              I only recall the situation you just described, when I received a mention without being included.

              But I have seen others run into similar situations when they just didn't know that tagging people adds them to a group conversation.

              stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                @jdp23 @julian

                "I think you ran into this as well?"

                I only recall the situation you just described, when I received a mention without being included.

                But I have seen others run into similar situations when they just didn't know that tagging people adds them to a group conversation.

                stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                stefan@stefanbohacek.online
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                @jdp23 @julian I've been pretty aware of this myself, but for some reason, on a few occasions I've replied to posts I thought were private, and were in fact public.

                Nothing embarrassing though! It helps to just be nice to people privately *and* publicly.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange

                  And also speaking of biolations of the principle of least surprise: it's interesitng to look at how these posts do and don't show up on the Discourse thread at https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/chats-are-now-federating-as-limited-visibility-posts-on-the-fediverse/4650/15 ...

                  • Julian's posts are all fine, no surprise, but a good sign for Discourse/NodeBB federation.

                  • @jdp23's posts show up twice on that thread.

                  • @nexus;s post didn't show up

                  Now how about this post from Mastodon?

                  @stefan @julian

                  stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stefan@stefanbohacek.online
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  @thenexusofprivacy @jdp23 @nexus @julian Hah, yeah, seeing mine!

                  Even though I've been in the fediverse for over a year now, and I'm pretty used to folks from different platforms talking to each other, it's still pretty fascinating to see this between platforms that I don't typically interact with.

                  Had the same sort of an "aha moment" with Lemmy not too long ago!

                  thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                    @thenexusofprivacy @jdp23 @nexus @julian Hah, yeah, seeing mine!

                    Even though I've been in the fediverse for over a year now, and I'm pretty used to folks from different platforms talking to each other, it's still pretty fascinating to see this between platforms that I don't typically interact with.

                    Had the same sort of an "aha moment" with Lemmy not too long ago!

                    thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                    thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchange
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Yeah, it's amazing when it works. When I tag a Lemmy community in a pst here and it actually shows up as a thread there, it's very cool.

                    Unfortunately half the time I tag a Lemmy community it doesn't show up as a post there, and there's never indication way. So it's not always amazing. But still, it's amazing when it works!

                    @stefan @jdp23 @nexus @julian

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                      @jdp23 @julian

                      "I think you ran into this as well?"

                      I only recall the situation you just described, when I received a mention without being included.

                      But I have seen others run into similar situations when they just didn't know that tagging people adds them to a group conversation.

                      jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jupiter_rowland@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18
                      @Stefan Bohacek @jdp23 @julian "Shadow mentioning" is a thing. (streams) and Forte do it to avoid clutter. Mentions don't have to be visible in a post/comment to work.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Popular