@erincandescent erin how do you feel about a fep that defines a conformance profile describing some "social networking protocol" that fedi could actually reasonably comply with (with some minor behavioral changes to avoid choking on things like multiple types or expecting hardcoded specific types)

i keep waffling on whether it would actually be a good idea with a good outcome, or a colossal waste of time better spent on something else

@trwnh honestly I think codifying things as they exist today with the rough corners filed off and compatibility notes for divergences could be useful

@erincandescent @trwnh I think the downside of this plan is to codify current bugs, like insisting that id properties have to be string URL values.

@evan @erincandescent i'd definitely call those out as bugs!