@evan @trwnh if I have a Collection / OrderedCollection, and a set of Objects within that collection, with each Object being independently addressable, is there any property I can use to link from the Object to the Collection it is part of?
-
thisismissem@hachyderm.ioreplied to erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net last edited by
@erincandescent @trwnh @evan and this is the point at which I'm lost and have no idea what you're talking about
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net last edited by
@erincandescent @evan @thisismissem oh i must have misunderstood, i thought you meant putting that snippet in the jsonld context, not in the jsonld graph
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to thisismissem@hachyderm.io last edited by
@thisismissem @erincandescent @evan i think “isMemberOfRelation” might be declaring that every member of the collection is related to some subject by being “inLabelSet”
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to dmitri@social.coop last edited by
@dmitri @erincandescent @evan @thisismissem wdym "canonical collection"? define "canonical"
-
dmitri@social.coopreplied to trwnh@mastodon.social last edited by
@trwnh @erincandescent @evan @thisismissem I think I meant it in the rel="canonical" (https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/consolidate-duplicate-urls ) / POSSE sense.
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to dmitri@social.coop last edited by
@dmitri @erincandescent @evan @thisismissem "canonical" in that sense has to do with preferring a specific identifier, not membership in a collection... so i'm still confused lol
-
dmitri@social.coopreplied to trwnh@mastodon.social last edited by
@trwnh @erincandescent @evan @thisismissem The analogy I was trying to make with rel="canonical" is that I don't think of, say, a blog post, as an opaque identifier. I think of it as an item in my blog's Posts collection. But then I can also add it to some other publication, say Medium.com, to its collection of posts. But indicate that its canonical location/collection is back on my site, in the POSSE sense.
-
erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netreplied to dmitri@social.coop last edited by@dmitri @trwnh @evan @thisismissem if I were giving it a name I'd call it the parent collection, I think, but there's no such relationship defined in AS2
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to dmitri@social.coop last edited by
@dmitri @erincandescent @evan @thisismissem that’s interesting and i generally disagree but i think i can see an LDP-esque argument for it in having resources exist within containers? but even then i don’t think LDP makes any single container “canonical” (or more appropriately “primary”) does it?
-
dmitri@social.coopreplied to erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net last edited by
@erincandescent @evan @thisismissem @trwnh "parent" collection is also a great term, as is @trwnh 's suggestion of "primary" collection
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to dmitri@social.coop last edited by
@dmitri @erincandescent @evan @thisismissem those two terms are both better than "canonical" but i'm still not 100% convinced that the concept itself makes sense. if it's a purposeful grouping and you really should view the object in context of some collection then use `as:context`. but most of the time, an object being included in a collection isn't inherently meaningful... if there's a specific meaning you're trying to signal, then it should be expressed with a meaningful relation.
-
thisismissem@hachyderm.ioreplied to trwnh@mastodon.social last edited by
@trwnh @dmitri @erincandescent @evan the specific meaning I'm trying to communicate here is that this label doesn't really exist in isolation, it's part of a broader set of labels.
-
trwnh@mastodon.socialreplied to thisismissem@hachyderm.io last edited by
@thisismissem @dmitri @erincandescent @evan ohh, if it's "doesn't exist in isolation but rather exists in a broader context" then i'd say `as:context` is fine for that. but if it's simply "part of a broader set of labels" then something less purposeful should be defined. https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/pre-fep-how-to-claim-that-an-object-is-part-of-a-given-collection/4606