Please make them visible when listing topics.

@julian @silverpill also your Link.href is being escaped incorrectly

Microblogs are also treats as ephemeral spaces, which is why people have long been caught off-guard by their old Tweets wrecking their lives. It’s a space where people behave as if they’re having a vocal conversation, and the form of ‘public’ they’re in is like a public park. People are around who could hear, but they have to be at the park and nearby as it’s said to hear. The idea that someone could show up to the park 5 years later and put up a fuss over something that was casually expressed is an impossibility. People have never treated forums as ephemeral. They’ve always been quasi-permanent spaces, where even the ability to edit your posts or replies is often time gated, or outright disallowed.

@julian Many of the comments in this thread are appearing in Hubzilla as being from activitypub@community.nodebb.org instead of the real author.P.S. I'd start a new topic for this but I don't know how remotely.

@julian Sorry if I was a bit salty earlier and I didn't want to rain on anyone's parade. There are many benefits to this proposed variation of quote posts where the person being quoted can update or delete their quote.Let me argue the other side then. One big benefit of this proposed quote post methodology is that it would be a version that Mastodon, et. al. would probably be willing to support. They have valid concerns that people will abuse quote posts to harass others. This proposal mitigates that.It also is useful in non-malicious contexts since people can fix typos and errors in their original post. It's also useful if the person being quoted wants to retract what they said, perhaps because they changed their mind on a topic or found new information.Malicious use can be mitigated in the UI by indicating the quoted person changed their post and providing a history of changes. Some platforms already do this for regular posts.The quoted person being able to delete their quote raises some unique philosophical questions, like whether a politician can delete something they said from a journalist's quote post. Or where someone intentionally changes their post in a malicious manner, which alters the quote post and makes the person quoting someone else look bad.So, there are many facets to this proposal. It still may be good to pursue even if some platforms aren't going to implement it. But there are also some scenarios we want to consider.

@julian @thisismissem which is to say, the following are equivalent within the same scope...@\context: [{toot: http://joinmastodon.org/ns#,Emoji: toot:Emoji},{toot: http://joinmastodon.org/ns#,IdentityProof: toot:IdentityProof}]@\context: [{toot: http://joinmastodon.org/ns#,Emoji: toot:Emoji,IdentityProof: toot:IdentityProof}]

Hi @kariboka @julian @evan @silverpill,I read page, not host. Please refrain from idiosyncratic or obsolete legacy.

@Stefan Bohacek @jdp23 @julian "Shadow mentioning" is a thing. (streams) and Forte do it to avoid clutter. Mentions don't have to be visible in a post/comment to work.

Interesting. I received a repeat notification from @ActivityPub on my last comment. I suppose that is how you are acknowledging that my post was sent to people following that category. I like it.

And yes, it works! It's certainly unintuitive but that's fair enough for a work in progress! It doesn't appear in the recent posts for that category (it was an empty category and still says "no new posts"), but that's a minor detail.

Ok, found the problem. It only works with the privilege guests / View Users enabled. I had fediverse / View Users enabled anyway but that wasn't enough. I'm not sure if that's intended? I guess it makes sense in principle…

Hi,I think It would be helpful to include examples of common use cases for ActivityPub integration in NodeBB detailed setup instructions with screenshots and troubleshooting tips for potential issues users might encounter. Additionally a FAQ section addressing common questions could be valuable.Thanks

I received an activity with this ID:https://community.nodebb.org/post/100125#activity/create/1719328808532#activity/announce/1719328833687It has two #-signs. I think it is not a valid URI: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.5A fragment identifier component is indicated by the presence of a number sign ("#") character and terminated by the end of the URI.

@unexpectedteapot Thank you. Indeed I missed that distinction, sorry for the noise @hongminhee.

@omega @Kichae @baris @julian I think the only problem here is you assume people should be able to "grok" it.I don't think that's a problem. I think people should be able to understand that the Internet is a communications platform. Growing up on IRC isn't a requirement to intuiting this; the point there was that I people understood it there and then. People should be able to understand it here and now, too. They've just been trained otherwise.

@julian @thisismissem @trwnh makes sense as well for “followers only”… if you post a post with abuse and include someone.. It *could* reach the somebody and all of their followers as well boosted via their server (with controls. Opens the abuse vector slightly.

Hi @julian @Claire - but sending incorrect json you get neither as of today, do you?