Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB-ActivityPub Bridge Test Instance

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Fediverse memes
  4. Big things happening on the butterfly site

Big things happening on the butterfly site

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse memes
fedimemes
74 Posts 36 Posters 18 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • extremeunicorn@feddit.orgE extremeunicorn@feddit.org

    Maybe, I can't really comment on what she did or "deserves" for it. I just know she made some transphobic remarks in the past, which is messed up. But there's still a difference between someone with a twisted world view and Trump/Putin who actually incarcerate and sponsor torture of people.

    However, the discussion was on whether something is "harmful" or not and you may actually argue that her BS doesn't physically "harm" anyone either, if you try to make that point.

    R This user is from outside of this forum
    R This user is from outside of this forum
    red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    wrote last edited by
    #38

    Rowling spends her considerable fortune to actively influence policy to hurt trans people.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • flamingos@feddit.ukF flamingos@feddit.uk

      Context

      recursiveparadox@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
      recursiveparadox@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
      recursiveparadox@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #39

      Um what? The hate for JKR is quite active on bsky. OP smoking crack; we hate that bitch.

      v01dworks@piefed.socialV comraderachel@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC 2 Replies Last reply
      37
      • recursiveparadox@lemmy.worldR recursiveparadox@lemmy.world

        Um what? The hate for JKR is quite active on bsky. OP smoking crack; we hate that bitch.

        v01dworks@piefed.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
        v01dworks@piefed.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
        v01dworks@piefed.social
        wrote last edited by
        #40

        Yeah I’ve never seen anyone on Bsky say anything remotely positive about her

        Or even neutral lol

        1 Reply Last reply
        17
        • B burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de

          Eh, her works may not be so poorly written as to be shitty, but they're just a pretty average story with a good editor. Her action scenes were average, tension building slightly above, and her characters were below. I'm sure if you went through the books with a fine tooth comb you could find a witty sentence or interesting paragraph, but nothing that would really stand out.

          D This user is from outside of this forum
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          dragontypewyvern@midwest.social
          wrote last edited by
          #41

          I too am roundly disappointed at the prose of that children's series largely appealing to children and not adults who haven't moved on after thirty years

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D dragontypewyvern@midwest.social

            I too am roundly disappointed at the prose of that children's series largely appealing to children and not adults who haven't moved on after thirty years

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
            wrote last edited by
            #42

            As you should be. Kids books should be just as good as adult books. Maybe not for the adults, but for the kids reading them.

            Having lower standards just because 'it's for kids,' is ridiculous.

            It's not like disney or dreamworks to half ass their kid oriented movies. They're often masterpieces in their own right. There's good reason that the lion king, the land before time, the road to el dorado, etc., are all viewed fondly even today. Hell, take it out of animation, even. Secondhand lions, wizard of oz, charlie and the chocolate factory... great stuff.

            Writing for kids can be just as complicated and well done in characters, setting, and 'elements' of a story like tension. Compare the hobbit to harry potter. The words tolkien chose may have been simple, in comparison to his the lord of the rings novels, but everything else was pretty damn good.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • B burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de

              As you should be. Kids books should be just as good as adult books. Maybe not for the adults, but for the kids reading them.

              Having lower standards just because 'it's for kids,' is ridiculous.

              It's not like disney or dreamworks to half ass their kid oriented movies. They're often masterpieces in their own right. There's good reason that the lion king, the land before time, the road to el dorado, etc., are all viewed fondly even today. Hell, take it out of animation, even. Secondhand lions, wizard of oz, charlie and the chocolate factory... great stuff.

              Writing for kids can be just as complicated and well done in characters, setting, and 'elements' of a story like tension. Compare the hobbit to harry potter. The words tolkien chose may have been simple, in comparison to his the lord of the rings novels, but everything else was pretty damn good.

              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              dragontypewyvern@midwest.social
              wrote last edited by dragontypewyvern@midwest.social
              #43

              Brb reading Dubliners to elementary students and making fun of them when they don't have an opinion on the themes of Irish nationalism and its implications in an ever more interconnected world.

              This obviously has nothing on the complex thought presented by UP, of course. My 500 page thesis on its handling of grief (tl;Dr talking dogs heal all wounds) will shortly follow.

              B skulblaka@sh.itjust.worksS 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • D dragontypewyvern@midwest.social

                Brb reading Dubliners to elementary students and making fun of them when they don't have an opinion on the themes of Irish nationalism and its implications in an ever more interconnected world.

                This obviously has nothing on the complex thought presented by UP, of course. My 500 page thesis on its handling of grief (tl;Dr talking dogs heal all wounds) will shortly follow.

                B This user is from outside of this forum
                B This user is from outside of this forum
                burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
                wrote last edited by
                #44

                If your books need real world themes and connections to be good, maybe you should try improving their writing instead.

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                  No.
                  Their federation does differ from the fediverse's, essentially, people have PDSes (personal data servers) which are just dumb datastores. These store data like your posts, likes, follows and blocks publicly.

                  AppViews are the other part, these take the data from PDSes and index it, and sort out interactions/notifications.

                  AppViewLite, for example, can be self hosted on any computer, and can be set to only take posts from select users, and discard posts after a while.

                  flamingos@feddit.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
                  flamingos@feddit.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
                  flamingos@feddit.uk
                  wrote last edited by flamingos@feddit.uk
                  #45

                  Is this federation, though? I've always thought of federation as a technical description of a platform's network topology, that it is several nodes communicating with one another to provide an overall platform.

                  Like, an AppViewLite is basically analogous to a Nostr replay and no one describes Nostr as federated.

                  A more interesting conversation is whether grafting federation onto Bluesky is worth the effort. If indexing the network can be done for a reasonable price, which it seems to be, then I don't see why people would put in the effort. If an app view/relay goes bad then you can just switch and get mostly the same experience.

                  I still believe that the ActivityPub solution of the multi stakeholder platform is a better direction, but I don't think the Bluesky idea of super easy migration should be dismissed out of hand like it so often is on this side of the conversation.

                  irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI 1 Reply Last reply
                  6
                  • flamingos@feddit.ukF flamingos@feddit.uk

                    Is this federation, though? I've always thought of federation as a technical description of a platform's network topology, that it is several nodes communicating with one another to provide an overall platform.

                    Like, an AppViewLite is basically analogous to a Nostr replay and no one describes Nostr as federated.

                    A more interesting conversation is whether grafting federation onto Bluesky is worth the effort. If indexing the network can be done for a reasonable price, which it seems to be, then I don't see why people would put in the effort. If an app view/relay goes bad then you can just switch and get mostly the same experience.

                    I still believe that the ActivityPub solution of the multi stakeholder platform is a better direction, but I don't think the Bluesky idea of super easy migration should be dismissed out of hand like it so often is on this side of the conversation.

                    irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                    irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                    irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    wrote last edited by
                    #46

                    Yeah, it's still federation. It's just pull-based rather than push based.
                    Bluesky was made to be a decentralised twitter from the beginning.

                    flamingos@feddit.ukF 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • C colforge@lemmy.world

                      They are absolutely equivalent and it’s ridiculous to argue otherwise.

                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      candy_colors@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #47

                      I miss the part where that's my problem

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                        Yeah, it's still federation. It's just pull-based rather than push based.
                        Bluesky was made to be a decentralised twitter from the beginning.

                        flamingos@feddit.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
                        flamingos@feddit.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
                        flamingos@feddit.uk
                        wrote last edited by
                        #48

                        Meh, I still don't see it as federation, but that might just be me projecting my own definition. Like, if we accept that bsky is federated then that would mean Bing is federated, just for arbitrary HTML rather than predetermined JSON.

                        irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • flamingos@feddit.ukF flamingos@feddit.uk

                          Meh, I still don't see it as federation, but that might just be me projecting my own definition. Like, if we accept that bsky is federated then that would mean Bing is federated, just for arbitrary HTML rather than predetermined JSON.

                          irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                          irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                          irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                          wrote last edited by
                          #49

                          It depends on your definition of federation.

                          It's defined as: "A system where various entities collaborate and share resources".

                          Nodes definitely collaborate, and resources (data) is shared.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D dragontypewyvern@midwest.social

                            Brb reading Dubliners to elementary students and making fun of them when they don't have an opinion on the themes of Irish nationalism and its implications in an ever more interconnected world.

                            This obviously has nothing on the complex thought presented by UP, of course. My 500 page thesis on its handling of grief (tl;Dr talking dogs heal all wounds) will shortly follow.

                            skulblaka@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                            skulblaka@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                            skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
                            wrote last edited by
                            #50

                            Compare Harry Potter with Animorphs and then see if you can still make this comparison with a straight face afterward. One of these two series treats it's elementary student audience with respect, and is widely beloved because of it. It ain't HP.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                              It did make good on true federation.

                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              M This user is from outside of this forum
                              monogram@feddit.nl
                              wrote last edited by
                              #51

                              It didn’t, bluesy made it able to selfhost your posts to keep their hosting costs down

                              All the pros of federation and being able to self host an instance don’t exist on Bluesy so why would you?

                              irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de

                                If your books need real world themes and connections to be good, maybe you should try improving their writing instead.

                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                dragontypewyvern@midwest.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #52

                                Fucking lol

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • zagorath@aussie.zoneZ zagorath@aussie.zone

                                  Isn't their federation really fucking weird though? Like you can't run a federated server unless you're capable of handling 100% of all the posts on the entire platform? That's a pretty huge barrier, and one could argue it's less "federation" and more "mirroring".

                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mesamunefire@piefed.social
                                  wrote last edited by mesamunefire@piefed.social
                                  #53

                                  Personally, its as simple as the ATProtocol is hard connected to Bluesky full stop. If Bluesky goes under, then AT will definitely suffer or fail.

                                  The fediverse (AKA ActivityPub) is not reliant on just one entity, its many many entities implementing the same protocol. So its MUCH more resilient than AT.

                                  But the good news is that we don't need to choose, as long as AP and AT both exist and keep going its going to be fine. The only issue becomes if services start only using AT over AP. Then we get a Microsoft situation where embrace extend extinguish occurs and we all become reliant on one not so benevolent corporation.

                                  Im still going to root for the more open source protocol for the above reasons.

                                  irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI zagorath@aussie.zoneZ 2 Replies Last reply
                                  4
                                  • M monogram@feddit.nl

                                    It didn’t, bluesy made it able to selfhost your posts to keep their hosting costs down

                                    All the pros of federation and being able to self host an instance don’t exist on Bluesy so why would you?

                                    irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #54

                                    No. Their hosting costs would be the same regardless of how many people self host.

                                    You get all the benefits of self hosting from appviews.

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M mesamunefire@piefed.social

                                      Personally, its as simple as the ATProtocol is hard connected to Bluesky full stop. If Bluesky goes under, then AT will definitely suffer or fail.

                                      The fediverse (AKA ActivityPub) is not reliant on just one entity, its many many entities implementing the same protocol. So its MUCH more resilient than AT.

                                      But the good news is that we don't need to choose, as long as AP and AT both exist and keep going its going to be fine. The only issue becomes if services start only using AT over AP. Then we get a Microsoft situation where embrace extend extinguish occurs and we all become reliant on one not so benevolent corporation.

                                      Im still going to root for the more open source protocol for the above reasons.

                                      irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #55

                                      Both protocols are open source.
                                      At can exist without bluesky, but most people are on it. I wouldn't say it's "hard connected" to it.
                                      Also: there are various implementations of Atproto.

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B buddascrayon@lemmy.world

                                        I have read the entire Harry Potter series (before she outed herself as being scum). And calling her writing bad is disingenuous. She isn't a bad writer, or more accurately she wasn't. (It's notable that her writing started to degrade very sharply not long after she outed herself as a TERF).

                                        She is a fucking horrid human being as are Orson Scott Card and Scott Adams along with a few others who's true colors shined through due to the pervasive nature of social media. But to blandly call their works "shitty" just as a lazy dig at them degrades you, not them. It makes your opinion worthless.

                                        J.K. Rowling is an absolute dipshit asswipe who should be tarred, feathered, and run out on a rail anywhere she goes. And more people should say so as loudly as possible. But the Harry Potter books were beloved by millions for a reason. If only she had gone blind, deaf, and dumb after she finished writing them. 😒

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        socsa@piefed.social
                                        wrote last edited by socsa@piefed.social
                                        #56

                                        I thought the books were aggressively mediocre YA trash from the start.

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                          Both protocols are open source.
                                          At can exist without bluesky, but most people are on it. I wouldn't say it's "hard connected" to it.
                                          Also: there are various implementations of Atproto.

                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mesamunefire@piefed.social
                                          wrote last edited by mesamunefire@piefed.social
                                          #57

                                          Lets agree to disagree.

                                          Ive seen many times where the company behind a tech goes under and the tech suffers because of it. And AT seems to be hard connected to Bluesky given the wikipedia article and the codebase that I have seen. But having competing services is not necessarily a bad thing. It can mean they can both learn from one another (like yarn and npm did a long time ago) and we get a better service. I dont necessarily want AT to fail, but I do want them to become MUCH more distant to Bluesky.

                                          And they have the most risk to become Enshittied given the crypto/investors/millionaires involved with BlueSky.

                                          Ill still be supporting AP with my development time since its easier for me to stand up and work with.

                                          irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.comI 1 Reply Last reply
                                          3
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular