GotoSocial created the interactionPolicy for activities, but declined creating a FEP
-
GotoSocial created the interactionPolicy for activities, but declined creating a FEP
Mastodon used the interactionPolicy and applied it to actor objects and will publish a FEP
Loops is using both
This is the magic of the fediverse.
Any project can innovate and create new extensions to push the fediverse forward.
And the biggest projects like @Mastodon will work to ensure compatibility, no matter how popular your project is, to the best of their ability.
WE ARE THE FUTURE
-
System shared this topic on
-
GotoSocial created the interactionPolicy for activities, but declined creating a FEP
Mastodon used the interactionPolicy and applied it to actor objects and will publish a FEP
Loops is using both
This is the magic of the fediverse.
Any project can innovate and create new extensions to push the fediverse forward.
And the biggest projects like @Mastodon will work to ensure compatibility, no matter how popular your project is, to the best of their ability.
WE ARE THE FUTURE
> And the biggest projects like Mastodon will work to ensure compatibility, no matter how popular your project is, to the best of their ability.
@dansup I don't mean to be a dick, but that's a load of crap. Mastodon cares about compatibility only when it's convenient for its developers. I have two or three tickets open on their bug tracker asking for their ActivityPub implementation to conform to the spec and they have been ignoring them for multiple years.
-
> And the biggest projects like Mastodon will work to ensure compatibility, no matter how popular your project is, to the best of their ability.
@dansup I don't mean to be a dick, but that's a load of crap. Mastodon cares about compatibility only when it's convenient for its developers. I have two or three tickets open on their bug tracker asking for their ActivityPub implementation to conform to the spec and they have been ignoring them for multiple years.
@mariusor I included to the best of their ability for a reason, I'm sure they have valid reasons, as I know from Pixelfed, it's not easy to support things that other platforms do.
-
@mariusor I included to the best of their ability for a reason, I'm sure they have valid reasons, as I know from Pixelfed, it's not easy to support things that other platforms do.
@dansup I would normally agree with you, but I wasn't thinking of custom functionality added by a random project, but about the basics of the ActivityPub standard.
Being the flagship project of the ActivityPub fediverse and having a broken implementation is not cool in my opinion.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login