Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. It is good that there are calls to be/remain wary.

It is good that there are calls to be/remain wary.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
activitypubsocialwebfediverse
6 Posts 4 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
    smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
    smallcircles@social.coop
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    It is good that there are calls to be/remain wary.

    https://kevinak.se/blog/be-wary-of-bluesky

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47095597

    Detecting issues early, and future problems can be anticipated and prepared for. And it allows people to make informed technology decisions and weigh the pros and cons, the risks.

    There are currently all kinds of typical tech ideology and protocol wars being waged, yet the answer to "Should I use this technology?" always starts with "It depends.."

    I am in the #ActivityPub camp for many of the reasons mentioned in the article. At the same time I am a multi-protocol #SocialWeb proponent. Use whatever works best to satisfy needs and forms a solution.

    The article also rightfully states that you are not safe from re-centralization risks and corporate capture with any protocol. Esp. not based on the protocol alone.

    Did we ever honestly investigate risks to our #fediverse? What if we get big uptake, adoption, billions of fedizens? What shape will that take. Will it bring us "true social"?

    boebels@mastodon.nlB ikuturso@mastodon.socialI julian@activitypub.spaceJ 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • tag-activitypub@relay.fedi.buzzT tag-activitypub@relay.fedi.buzz shared this topic
    • smallcircles@social.coopS smallcircles@social.coop

      It is good that there are calls to be/remain wary.

      https://kevinak.se/blog/be-wary-of-bluesky

      https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47095597

      Detecting issues early, and future problems can be anticipated and prepared for. And it allows people to make informed technology decisions and weigh the pros and cons, the risks.

      There are currently all kinds of typical tech ideology and protocol wars being waged, yet the answer to "Should I use this technology?" always starts with "It depends.."

      I am in the #ActivityPub camp for many of the reasons mentioned in the article. At the same time I am a multi-protocol #SocialWeb proponent. Use whatever works best to satisfy needs and forms a solution.

      The article also rightfully states that you are not safe from re-centralization risks and corporate capture with any protocol. Esp. not based on the protocol alone.

      Did we ever honestly investigate risks to our #fediverse? What if we get big uptake, adoption, billions of fedizens? What shape will that take. Will it bring us "true social"?

      boebels@mastodon.nlB This user is from outside of this forum
      boebels@mastodon.nlB This user is from outside of this forum
      boebels@mastodon.nl
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @smallcircles it depends

      smallcircles@social.coopS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • boebels@mastodon.nlB boebels@mastodon.nl

        @smallcircles it depends

        smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
        smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
        smallcircles@social.coop
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @boebels Exactly! 😃

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • smallcircles@social.coopS smallcircles@social.coop

          It is good that there are calls to be/remain wary.

          https://kevinak.se/blog/be-wary-of-bluesky

          https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47095597

          Detecting issues early, and future problems can be anticipated and prepared for. And it allows people to make informed technology decisions and weigh the pros and cons, the risks.

          There are currently all kinds of typical tech ideology and protocol wars being waged, yet the answer to "Should I use this technology?" always starts with "It depends.."

          I am in the #ActivityPub camp for many of the reasons mentioned in the article. At the same time I am a multi-protocol #SocialWeb proponent. Use whatever works best to satisfy needs and forms a solution.

          The article also rightfully states that you are not safe from re-centralization risks and corporate capture with any protocol. Esp. not based on the protocol alone.

          Did we ever honestly investigate risks to our #fediverse? What if we get big uptake, adoption, billions of fedizens? What shape will that take. Will it bring us "true social"?

          ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
          ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
          ikuturso@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @smallcircles not being safe because of the protocol alone is patently obvious and it has been infuriating to watch the Bluesky people obfuscate this and the fact that a protocol being decentralized in theory is also not the same thing as the platform being decentralized constantly.

          Since it is so obvious I can only presume they do it on purpose (and then others on the bandwagon who just say what others have told them repeat it).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • smallcircles@social.coopS smallcircles@social.coop

            It is good that there are calls to be/remain wary.

            https://kevinak.se/blog/be-wary-of-bluesky

            https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47095597

            Detecting issues early, and future problems can be anticipated and prepared for. And it allows people to make informed technology decisions and weigh the pros and cons, the risks.

            There are currently all kinds of typical tech ideology and protocol wars being waged, yet the answer to "Should I use this technology?" always starts with "It depends.."

            I am in the #ActivityPub camp for many of the reasons mentioned in the article. At the same time I am a multi-protocol #SocialWeb proponent. Use whatever works best to satisfy needs and forms a solution.

            The article also rightfully states that you are not safe from re-centralization risks and corporate capture with any protocol. Esp. not based on the protocol alone.

            Did we ever honestly investigate risks to our #fediverse? What if we get big uptake, adoption, billions of fedizens? What shape will that take. Will it bring us "true social"?

            julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
            julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
            julian@activitypub.space
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @smallcircles@social.coop I'm not at all surprised that the Hacker News crowd is so pro-Bluesky, coming to its defense in the comments.

            I know that those commenters aren't the same as the AP critics, but it certainly does seem like they give BlueSky and ATProto the widest benefit of the doubt, while at the same time criticizing ActivityPub for the smallest of faults.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
              smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
              smallcircles@social.coop
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @julian yeah, heavy on people who look more at the 'growth hackability' coefficient and profitability, than moral compass or the amount of soul you have to sell.

              But there are roughly 2 crowds on HN. A sizable group is comparable to value-aligned folks you find here on the fediverse. They are the ones making critical notes, and ensure many of the good articles pop up on the front page.

              And as a humane tech activist it is relatively easy to 'bump' the positive messages that blissful unaware devs need to see, to raise awareness on things. Esp. if you are in Europe it is relatively easy to get things to the front page that highlight the big problems of our modern tech.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0

              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

              Register Login
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups